Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MIKE MC CAA

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MIKE MC CAA in 723 STARK STREET, WAUSAU, WI 54403 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 340982891.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mike MC CAA — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mike MC CAA is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MIKE MC CAA
Site address
723 STARK STREET
City
WAUSAU
State
WI
ZIP
54403
Mailing
715 KICKBUSH ST., WAUSAU, WI 54403
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236118
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2015
Abate by
Dec 16, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program as may be necessary to comply with the General safety and health provisions covered in 29 CFR 1926.20.  a)  On or about October 13, 2015, during roofing work, at a site located at 723 Stark Street in Wausau, WI 54403, the employer had not developed and implemented a safety and health program that provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials, and equipment.  The employer also did not develop and implement a safety and health program to ensure that employees recognized and the proper procedures were followed for fall hazards greater than 6 feet and the proper use of ladders on construction sites.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   a)  On or about October 13, 2015, during roofing work at a site located at 723 Stark Street in Wausau, WI 54403, the employer failed to ensure that employees use a fall protection system when exposed to falls greater than 16 feet to the ground on a high slope roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  a)  On and or about October 13, 2015, during roofing work, 1586 Schaefer Circle, Appleton, WI 54915, the employer did not ensure that each employee engaged in roofing work had been trained in the fall protection requirements to identify and implement conventional or personal fall protection while working on surfaces from approximately 16 feet and greater from the lower ground level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2015
Abate by
Nov 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:   a)  On and or about October 13, 2015, during roofing work at 723 Stark Street in Wausau, WI 54403, the employer did not ensure that the silver portable KPro Non-Conductive Fiberglass ladder leaning against the left hand of the house was extended 3 feet to access upper landing surfaces and was not secured at the top of the ladder to prevent displacement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2015
Abate by
Nov 9, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards:  a)  On or about October 13, 2015, during roofing work, at a site located at 723 Stark Street in Wausau, WI 54403, the employer did not ensure that each employee engaged in roofing work had been trained in how to use ladders safely, and to recognize hazards related to ladder set up by properly extending 3 feet above the landing and secured for displacement to minimize hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340982891.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.