Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ADVANCED RESTORATION CONTRACTORS

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ADVANCED RESTORATION CONTRACTORS in 134 LINCOLN AVE., YOUNGSTOWN, OH 44503 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 340987072.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Advanced Restoration Contractors — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Advanced Restoration Contractors is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
134 LINCOLN AVE.
City
YOUNGSTOWN
State
OH
ZIP
44503
Mailing
141 SHERMAN DR., INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46201
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236118
Employees
35
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 20, 2015
Abate by
Oct 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:     On or about October 15, 2015 at a job site located at 134 Lincoln Ave., Youngstown, Ohio 44503, during construction activities including but not limited to masonry installation, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program. Employees were mixing Type 1/11 masonry mud that contained Portland cement.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.134 D01 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 20, 2015
Abate by
Oct 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:     On or about October 15, 2015, on a job site located at 134 Lincoln Ave., Youngstown, Ohio 44503, during construction activities including but not limited to masonry installation, the employer did not effectively evaluate employee exposure to crystalline silica exposure while employees were required to mix mortar during block laying operation.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.102 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.    On or about October 15, 2015, while performing masonry activities on a jobsite located at 134 Lincoln Ave., Youngstown, Ohio 44503, the employer failed to protect employees from potential eye injuries while using a concrete cut off saw to cut bricks by requiring the employee to wear safety glasses.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $3500

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $3,500
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level.  On or about October 15, 2015, while performing masonry activities on a jobsite located at 134 Lincoln Ave., Youngstown, Ohio 44503, the employer failed to protect employees from a fall of approximately 25 feet when a top and a mid-rail were not installed on the end of the masonry scaffold.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $3500
  • — C (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $3500

1926.1053 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $2,100
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed.    On or about October 15, 2015, while performing masonry activities on a jobsite located at 134 Lincoln Ave., Youngstown, Ohio 44503, the employer failed to protect employees from a fall of approximately 5 feet when the ladder used to access the roof did not extend at least 36 inches past its landing area.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $2100
  • — C (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $2100

1926.1053 B04

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed.    On or about October 15, 2015, while performing masonry activities on a jobsite located at 134 Lincoln Ave., Youngstown, Ohio 44503, the employer failed to protect employees from a fall of approximately 5 feet when an a-frame ladder was used incorrectly to gain access to the upper roof.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $2100

View Advanced Restoration Contractors's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340987072.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.