Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: KLEEN SWEEP VENTURES, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of KLEEN SWEEP VENTURES, INC. in 34C INDUSTRIAL PARK ROAD, NIANTIC, CT 06357 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 340990571.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Kleen Sweep Ventures, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Kleen Sweep Ventures, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
34C INDUSTRIAL PARK ROAD
City
NIANTIC
State
CT
ZIP
06357
Mailing
26 MONTAUK AVENUE, NEW LONDON, CT 06320
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
45
Ownership type
Private (A)

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 11, 2015
Abate by
Dec 31, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1)(i): The employer did not select and have each affected employee use, the types of personal protective equipment that would protect the affected employee(s) from the hazards identified in the hazard assessment:  34C INDUSTRIAL PARK ROAD, NIANTIC, CT:  On or about October 15, 2015, the employer had not reviewed operations nor evaluated the processes to identify the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) necessary for employees to perform each task safely.  Operations in which employees wore inappropriate PPE included, but were not limited to:  A)  Wearing a shock-absorbing lanyard while using an aerial boom lift to clean the walls.  B)  Wearing safety glasses as opposed to splash goggles while dispensing, mixing, and spraying corrosive liquids.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1750
  • · Z (S) $3500

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340990571.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.