CLEBURNE, TX —
OSHA Inspection: IGNACIO BARBOZA
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of IGNACIO BARBOZA in 839 N NOLAN RIVER ROAD, CLEBURNE, TX 76033 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 340991199.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- IGNACIO BARBOZA
- Site address
- 839 N NOLAN RIVER ROAD
- City
- CLEBURNE
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 76033
- Mailing
- 1623 PLEASANT DRIVE, DALLAS, TX 75217
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238170
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Nov 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,440 · Current $864 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. At a commercial construction site, employees performing cornice work using air nail guns on south side of the building were not provided with eye and face protection exposing the employee to eye and face injuries.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $864
- — Z (S) $1440
1926.403 B02
- Issued
- Nov 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $864 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(2): Listed, labeled, or certified equipment was not installed and used in accordance with instructions included in the listing, labeling, or certification: At a commercial construction site, employees performing cornice work were using a job made extension cord with an electrical receptacle box. The employer did not ensure that electrical equipment was used in accordance with its listing and labeling. The job made cord was used to power a Makita Circular Saw and a Porter Cable Air Compressor exposing the employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $864
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.405 G02 IV
- Issued
- Nov 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws: At a commercial construction site, employees performing cornice work were using a job made extension cord with an electrical receptacle box to supply electrical power to a Makita Circular Saw and a Porter Cable Air Compressor that was not provided with strain relief exposing the employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.416 E01
- Issued
- Nov 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(e)(1): Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used: At a commercial construction site, employees performing cornice work were using an extension cord that was damaged in multiple locations exposing inner electrical wiring to supply electrical power to a circular saw and to a portable air compressor exposing them to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 B02
- Issued
- Nov 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $1,080 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2): Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (b)(2)(ii) of this section, each scaffold platform and/or walkway was not at least 18 inches (46 cm) wide: At a commercial construction site, the employer did not ensure that employees performing cornice work from a scaffold that was at least 18 inches wide. Employees were exposed to falls of more than 19 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1080
- — Z (S) $1800
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Nov 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $1,080 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section: At a commercial construction site, the employer did not ensure that employees performing cornice work from a scaffold were provided with fall protection exposing the employees to fall hazards of approximately 19 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1080
- — Z (S) $1800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340991199.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.