Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: NORTH TOPEKA FABRICATION, LLC

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of NORTH TOPEKA FABRICATION, LLC in 3801 NW 14TH STREET, TOPEKA, KS 66618 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 340991421.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch North Topeka Fabrication, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for North Topeka Fabrication, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3801 NW 14TH STREET
City
TOPEKA
State
KS
ZIP
66618
Mailing
3801 NW 14TH STREET, TOPEKA, KS 66618
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332312
Employees
21
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 7, 2016
Abate by
May 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced

Hazardous substances 81108111

29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer shall administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program, as described in paragraphs (c) through (o) of this section, whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (TWA) of 85 decibels measured on the A scale or, equivalently, a dose of fifty percent:  An employee engaged in production activities in the welding area was exposed to health hazards in that a comprehensive hearing conservation program had not been developed and implemented.  A personal dosimeter sound level of 89.45 decibels was recorded during the 485 minutes sampling period on December 16, 2015.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1960
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 21 exposed
Issued
Apr 7, 2016
Abate by
May 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer shall assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment:  Employees engaged in production activities throughout the facility were exposed to struck-by hazards in that a hazard assessment had not been completed to identify personal protective equipment needs.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $840
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 7, 2016
Abate by
May 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  Employees engaged in production activities at the following locations were exposed to struck-by hazards in that eye protection was not provided:  a) Grinding carbon steel in the welding area  b) At the AMADA LASMAC LC-2415±2 punching machine in the shop
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 21 exposed
Issued
Apr 7, 2016
Abate by
May 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible:    Employees engaged in grinding and welding alloys throughout the facility voluntarily using filtering face piece respirators were exposed to respiratory hazards in that information contained in Appendix D was not provided.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $840
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 21 exposed
Issued
Apr 7, 2016
Abate by
May 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):  Employees engaged in forklift operation activities in the shop were exposed to struck-by hazards in that forklift training and evaluation had not been completed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2400

1910.178 A06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 21 exposed
Issued
Apr 7, 2016
Abate by
May 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6): The employer did not ensure that all nameplates and markings were in place:  Employees engaged in production and material handling activities throughout the shop using and near the Yale 50VX forklift were exposed to struck-by hazards in that the control levers were not marked.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 21 exposed
Issued
Apr 7, 2016
Abate by
May 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  Employees engaged in welding activities using anti-spatter located at the south side of the shop were exposed to health hazards in that a written hazard communication program had not been developed at the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $840
  • — Z (S) $1200

1904.32 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 21 exposed
Issued
Apr 7, 2016
Abate by
May 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.32(a)(2): Create an annual summary of injuries and illnesses recorded on the OSHA 300 Log.  The employer did not maintain the OSHA 300A form or equivalent annual summary.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $400

View North Topeka Fabrication, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340991421.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.