Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: UNIVERSITY OF TULSA NORTH CAMPUS

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of UNIVERSITY OF TULSA NORTH CAMPUS in 2450 E. MARSHALL ST., TULSA, OK 74110 (NAICS 611310). OSHA activity number 340993856.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch University of Tulsa North Campus — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for University of Tulsa North Campus is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2450 E. MARSHALL ST.
City
TULSA
State
OK
ZIP
74110
Mailing
2450 E. MARSHALL ST., TULSA, OK 74110
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
611310
Employees
30
Ownership type
A

13 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.101 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2016
Abate by
Feb 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,625 · Current $1,575 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.101(b): The in-plant handling, storage, and utilization of all compressed gases in cylinders, portable tanks, rail tankcars, or motor vehicle cargo tanks were not in accordance with Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet P-1-1965, which is incorporated by reference as specified in CFR 1910.6:  On or about October 15, 2015, the employer did not ensure bottles of compressed gasses such as but not limited to carbon dioxide, hydrogen, air and nitrogen were stored in accordance with the Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet P-1-1965 exposing employees to the hazard of struck-by.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1575
  • — Z (S) $2625

1910.103 B01 IV E

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2016
Abate by
Feb 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.103(b)(1)(iv)(e): Each mobile hydrogen supply unit used as part of a hydrogen system was not adequately secured to prevent movement:  On or about October 15, 2015, the employer did not ensure a cylinder of compressed hydrogen was adequately secured to prevent movement exposing employees to hazards associated with fire and explosion.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.103 B01 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2016
Abate by
Feb 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.103(b)(1)(v): The hydrogen storage location was not permanently placarded as follows: "HYDROGEN - FLAMMABLE GAS - NO SMOKING - NO OPEN FLAMES," or equivalent:  On or about October 15, 2015, the employer did not ensure a cylinder bank of 12 compressed hydrogen gas bottles was placarded with "HYDROGEN - FLAMMABLE GAS - NO SMOKING - NO OPEN FLAMES," exposing employees to hazards associated with fire and explosion.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2016
Abate by
Feb 26, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:   On or about October 15, 2015, the employer did not ensure employees voluntarily wearing tight-fitting respiratory protection had received the required respiratory protection medical evaluation. Employees were exposed to hazards associated with respiratory distress.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1260
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2016
Abate by
Feb 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employees to use appropriate hand protection when employees hands were exposed to hazardous conditions:   On or about October 15, 2015, the employer did not select and require employees to wear appropriate hand protection while using chemicals such as, but not limited to, acetone and toluene exposing employees to hazards associated with chemical exposure.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.165 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2016
Abate by
Feb 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,625 · Current $1,575 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.165(d)(1): Employee alarm systems were not maintained in operating condition:  On or about October 15, 2015, the employer did not ensure hydrogen sulfide alarms in the special projects building were properly calibrated exposing employees to hazards associated with exposure to hydrogen sulfide.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1575
  • — Z (S) $2625

1910.178 L01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2016
Abate by
Feb 26, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,625 · Current $1,575 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck:  On or about October 15, 2015, the employer did not ensure employees received training before being allowed to operate a powered industrial truck exposing employees to hazards such as struck-by and caught-in between.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1575
  • — Z (S) $2625

1910.178 Q01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2016
Abate by
Feb 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(1): Any power-operated industrial truck not in safe operating condition was not taken out of service, and/or repairs were not made by authorized personnel:   On or about October 15, 2015, the employer did not ensure the backup alarm and light on the Hyster forklift were operational exposing employees to the hazard of struck-by.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2016
Abate by
Feb 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service:  On or about October 15, 2015, the employer did not ensure powered industrial trucks were examined daily prior to being placed in service exposing employees to the hazard of struck-by.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2016
Abate by
Feb 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(f)(2): The storage and handling of liquefied petroleum gas fuel was not in accordance with NFPA Storage and Handling of Liquefied Petroleum Gases (NFPA No. 58-1969), which is incorporated by reference as specified in 29 CFR 1910.6:  On or about October 15, 2015, the employer did not ensure containers of propane used to power forklifts used in the facility were stored in accordance with NFPA No. 58-1969 5.1(a) exposing employees to hazards associated with fire and explosion.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 F06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2016
Abate by
Feb 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,150 · Current $1,890 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(i): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the information required by 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(1)(i) through 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(1)(v):  On or about October 15, 2015, the employer did not ensure all containers of hazardous chemicals was properly labeled exposing employees to hazards associated with contact with hazardous chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1890
  • — Z (S) $3150

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2016
Abate by
Feb 26, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical:  On or about October 15, 2015, the employer did not provide safety data sheets for each chemical in the workplace exposing employees to hazards associated with contact with hazardous chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2016
Abate by
Feb 26, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  On or about October 15, 2015, the employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals used in the workplace exposing employees to hazards associated with chemical exposure.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340993856.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.