NEWBURYPORT, MA —
OSHA Inspection: ALFRED QUINTON
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ALFRED QUINTON in 253 MERRIMAC STREET, NEWBURYPORT, MA 01950 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 340995976.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ALFRED QUINTON
- Site address
- 253 MERRIMAC STREET
- City
- NEWBURYPORT
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 01950
- Mailing
- 11 CHRISTINA AVE, BILLERICA, MA 01821
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236118
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.404 B01 I
- Issued
- Nov 6, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(i): Employer did not use either ground fault circuit interrupters as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, or an assured equipment grounding conductor program as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section to protect employees on construction sites. (a) Location - Merrimac Street, Newburyport, MA: On or about 10/15/15, employees were not protected from electrical shock and burns while using electric equipment that was not GFCI protected.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Nov 6, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: (a) Location - Merrimac Street, Newburyport, MA: On or about 10/15/15, employees were exposed to falls when working on a working surface greater than six feet above the ground.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.602 C01 VI
- Issued
- Nov 6, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(vi): Industrial truck(s) in use did not meet the applicable requirements of design, construction, stability, inspection, testing, maintenance, and operation, as defined in American National Standards Institute B56.1-1969, Safety Standards for Powered Industrial Trucks. (a) Location - Merrimac Street, Newburyport, MA: On or about 10/15/15, a rough terrain forklift was left unattended with the hoisting boom extended to third floor of a residential building with building material on the forks.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236118)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340995976.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.