SHARPSBURG, GA —
OSHA Inspection: J. BERGERON, INC.
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of J. BERGERON, INC. in 14 J. WALTER BYROM ROAD, SHARPSBURG, GA 30277 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 340996339.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- J. BERGERON, INC.
- Site address
- 14 J. WALTER BYROM ROAD
- City
- SHARPSBURG
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30277
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 609, SHARPSBURG, GA 30277
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811121
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Dec 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
13771539H130
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (a) Spray painting area- The employer had not established a written respiratory protection program for an employee required to wear a full face mask air purifying respirator while spray painting automobile parts.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Dec 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
13771539H130
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (a) Spray Painting Area- An employee required to wear a tight-fitting face piece respirator while spray painting automobile parts had not received a medical evaluation to determine his ability to safely wear the respirator.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Dec 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
13771539H130
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: (a) Spray Painting Area- An employee required to wear a tight-fitting face piece respirator while spray painting automobile parts had not received a fit test prior to being required to use the respirator in the workplace.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Dec 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
04401377153924602590
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (a) Spray painting area- The employer had not established a written hazard communication program for an employee exposed to hazardous substances such as, but not limited to, paints and hardeners containing isocyanates, xylene, toluene and n-butyl acetate.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 H03 IV
- Issued
- Dec 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
04401377153924602590
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication training did not include an explanation of the Global Harmonization System (GHS) with respect to the labeling, pictograms, and safety data sheets, including the order of information and how employees could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information: (a) Spray painting area- The employer did not provide hazard communication training to employees on the new Global Harmonization System (GHS) that took effect on December 1, 2013.The employee was not familiar with the new standard, safety data sheets, and pictograms. The employee was exposed to hazardous chemicals, such as but not limited to, paints and hardeners/activators containing xylene, toluene, butyl acetate, and isocyanates.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811121)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340996339.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.