Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RACHELS MACHINE AND FABRICATION, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of RACHELS MACHINE AND FABRICATION, INC. in 170 EAST RAILROAD STREET, WADLEY, GA 30477 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 340996636.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Rachels Machine and Fabrication, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rachels Machine and Fabrication, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
170 EAST RAILROAD STREET
City
WADLEY
State
GA
ZIP
30477
Mailing
P.O. BOX 1089, WADLEY, GA 30477
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332710
Employees
19
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2016
Abate by
Apr 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a) In the welding area, on or about and at times prior to November 12, 2015, the employer did not maintain a written respiratory protection program for two employees who were required to wear 3M cartridge style, filtering face piece respirators while performing their welding tasks.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2016
Abate by
Apr 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a) In the welding area, on or about and at times prior to November 12, 2015, the employer did not provide for medical evaluations for two employees who were required to wear 3M cartridge style, filtering face piece respirators while performing their welding tasks.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2016
Abate by
Apr 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  a) In the welding area, on or about and at times prior to November 12, 2015, the employer did not provide for fit testing for two employees who were required to wear 3M half face, cartridge style respirators while performing welding tasks during the course of their shift.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 H02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2016
Abate by
Apr 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or  were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve:  a) In the welding area, on or about and at times prior to November 12, 2015, the employer did not ensure respirators used by two employees, during the course of their welding tasks, were properly stored upon completion of their duties.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2016
Abate by
Apr 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a) In the production area, on or about and at times prior to November 12, 2015, the employer did not provide for a written hazard communication program for employees who used chemicals such as, but not limited to TNMEC Protective Coating.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2016
Abate by
Apr 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use:  a) In the production area, on or about and a times prior to November 12, 2015, the employer did not maintain the Safety Data Sheets for the chemicals used by employees such as, but not limited to TNMEC Protective Coating.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2016
Abate by
Apr 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a) In the production area, on or about and at times prior to November 12, 2105, the employer did not provide training, for employees, on the various chemicals they used during the course of their duties, such as, but not limited to the application of TNMEC Protective Coating.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340996636.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.