BROKAW, WI —
OSHA Inspection: MILL COATING, INC.
Programmed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a programmed Related safety inspection of MILL COATING, INC. in US51 AT FALCON DR., BROKAW, WI 54417 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 340997568.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MILL COATING, INC.
- Site address
- US51 AT FALCON DR.
- City
- BROKAW
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54417
- Mailing
- 1878 PRIDE TERRACE, SUAMICO, WI 54173
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Programmed Related (J)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238320
- Employees
- 23
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 C02 V
- Issued
- Dec 1, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,520 · Current $1,764 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(v): Fork-lifts were used to support scaffold platforms while the entire platform was not attached to the fork and the fork-lift was moved horizontally while the platform was occupied: Mill Coatings project site located at US51 at Falcon Dr. Brokaw, WI: On 10/16/15, an employee was exposed to falling while working from a pile of scaffold planks supported by a rough terrain forklift.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1764
- — Z (S) $2520
1926.502 A02
- Issued
- Dec 1, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,520 · Current $1,764 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(a)(2): The employer did not provide and install all fall protection systems required by this subpart for employee(s) and did not comply with all other pertinent requirements of this subpart before employee(s) began the work that necessitates the fall protection: Mill Coatings Inc. project site located at US51 at Falcon Dr. Brokaw, WI: On 10/16/15, an employee was exposed to falls while working from the load supported by a rough terrain forklift when: A) his personal fall arrest system lanyard was wrapped around the backrest of the forklift and hooked onto itself; B) when his personal fall arrest system lanyard was wrapped around the backrest of the forklift which had sharp edges that could cut or abrade the lanyard in a fall; C) when his personal fall arrest system lanyard was wrapped around the backrest of the forklift which is not independent of the supporting structure; D) when his personal fall arrest system lanyard was wrapped around the backrest of the forklift near his foot level, allowing him to fall greater than 6; E) and a second employee was exposed to serious injury in the event of a fall while wearing his harness under his coat with the lanyard coming out at his waist which would cause the employee to fall upside down.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1764
- — Z (S) $2520
1926.451 A06
- Issued
- Dec 1, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $360 · Current $252 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person: Mill Coatings Inc. project site located at US51 at Falcon Dr. Brokaw, WI: On 10/16/15, employees were exposed to fall hazards while erecting and working from a suspended scaffold that had not been designed by a qualified person or erected in accordance with written instructions or plans, in that: A) the capacity of the components used in the construction of the suspended scaffold were not known; B) the scaffold system had not been evaluated by a qualified person for compliance with the scaffold Standards; C) the parapet brackets were not tied back or provided with other means to prevent inadvertent movement; D) scaffold platforms were not installed level when the profile of the girders changed at the center bridge pier; E) scaffold platforms are not secured to the trusses to prevent uplift from wind; F) and the scaffold system is not assembled in accordance with any written instruction or diagrams.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $252
- — Z (O) $360
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238320)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340997568.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.