Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MILL COATING, INC.

Programmed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a programmed Related safety inspection of MILL COATING, INC. in US51 AT FALCON DR., BROKAW, WI 54417 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 340997568.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mill Coating, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mill Coating, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MILL COATING, INC.
Site address
US51 AT FALCON DR.
City
BROKAW
State
WI
ZIP
54417
Mailing
1878 PRIDE TERRACE, SUAMICO, WI 54173
Inspection type
Programmed Related (J)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238320
Employees
23
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 C02 V

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,520 · Current $1,764 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(v): Fork-lifts were used to support scaffold platforms while the entire platform was not attached to the fork and the fork-lift was moved horizontally while the platform was occupied:     Mill Coatings project site located at US51 at Falcon Dr. Brokaw, WI: On 10/16/15, an employee was exposed to falling while working from a pile of scaffold planks supported by a rough terrain forklift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1764
  • — Z (S) $2520

1926.502 A02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,520 · Current $1,764 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(a)(2): The employer did not provide and install all fall protection systems required by this subpart for employee(s) and did not comply with all other pertinent requirements of this subpart before employee(s) began the work that necessitates the fall protection:     Mill Coatings Inc. project site located at US51 at Falcon Dr. Brokaw, WI: On 10/16/15, an employee was exposed to falls while working from the load supported by a rough terrain forklift when:  A)    his personal fall arrest system lanyard was wrapped around the backrest of the forklift and hooked onto itself;    B)    when his personal fall arrest system lanyard was wrapped around the backrest of the forklift which had sharp edges that could cut or abrade the lanyard in a fall;    C)    when his personal fall arrest system lanyard was wrapped around the backrest of the forklift which is not independent of the supporting structure;    D)    when his personal fall arrest system lanyard was wrapped around the backrest of the forklift near his foot level, allowing him to fall greater than 6;    E)     and a second employee was exposed to serious injury in the event of a fall while wearing his harness under his coat with the lanyard coming out at his waist which would cause the employee to fall upside down.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1764
  • — Z (S) $2520

1926.451 A06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Dec 1, 2015
Abate by
Jan 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $360 · Current $252 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person:       Mill Coatings Inc. project site located at US51 at Falcon Dr. Brokaw, WI: On 10/16/15, employees were exposed to fall hazards while erecting and working from a suspended scaffold that had not been designed by a qualified person or erected in accordance with written instructions or plans, in that:  A) the capacity of the components used in the construction of the suspended scaffold were not known;    B) the scaffold system had not been evaluated by a qualified person for compliance with the scaffold Standards;    C) the parapet brackets were not tied back or provided with other means to prevent inadvertent movement;    D) scaffold platforms were not installed level when the profile of the girders changed at the center bridge pier;    E) scaffold platforms are not secured to the trusses to prevent uplift from wind;    F) and the scaffold system is not assembled in accordance with any written instruction or diagrams.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $252
  • — Z (O) $360

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340997568.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.