MARIETTA, GA —
OSHA Inspection: MAACO
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of MAACO in 1350 SOUTH MARIETTA PKWY, MARIETTA, GA 30067 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 340999648.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MAACO
- Site address
- 1350 SOUTH MARIETTA PKWY
- City
- MARIETTA
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30067
- Mailing
- 1350 SOUTH MARIETTA PKWY, MARIETTA, GA 30067
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811121
- Employees
- 19
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Nov 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT a.) Paint Shop: The employees working in the spray booth were required to wear a 3M tight fitting half face respirator had not received an annual FIT test. The employees were exposed to upper respiratory irritation.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Nov 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met a) Facility: The employer did not establish a written hazard communication program for the employee exposed to hazardous substances such as, but not limited to hardener that can cause skin irritation.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 H03 IV
- Issued
- Nov 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information: a) Facility: The employees have not received training on the new labeling requirements and safety data sheet format.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Maaco
View Maaco's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811121)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340999648.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.