FORT WORTH, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: DAVID RICARIO
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DAVID RICARIO in 4108 BENT ELM LANE, FORT WORTH, TX 76109 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341001550.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DAVID RICARIO
- Site address
- 4108 BENT ELM LANE
- City
- FORT WORTH
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 76109
- Mailing
- 5317 GRAHAM STREET, FORT WORTH, TX 76114
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Nov 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,440 · Current $576 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. At a residential roofing site, two employees performing roofing work using circular saws and air nail guns were not provided eye protection. The employees were exposed to eye injuries.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $576
- · Z (S) $1440
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Nov 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $720 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): At a residential roofing site, employees performing roofing work were exposed to an unprotected fall hazard of approximately 18 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $720
- · Z (S) $1800
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Nov 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $720 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: At a residential roofing site, two employees performing roofing work were using extension ladders that did not extend (3) feet above the landing to access and egress the roof. The employees were exposed to a fall hazard of up to (18) feet.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $720
- · Z (S) $1800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341001550.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.