OSHA Inspection: PUTNAM BODY SHOP

Issued

Feb 19, 2016

Abate by

Mar 16, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a) Paint shop:  The employer did not establish or implement a written respiratory program for the employee mandated to wear a full face mask respirator while spraying in the paint shop.

Issued

Feb 19, 2016

Abate by

Mar 16, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a) Paint shop:  The employer did not provide a medical evaluation for the employee mandated to wear full face mask respirator while spraying in the paint shop.

Issued

Feb 19, 2016

Abate by

Mar 16, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  a) Paint shop:  The employer did not provide an annual fit test for the employee mandated to wear a full face mask respirator while spraying in the paint shop.

Issued

Feb 19, 2016

Abate by

Mar 16, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary:  a) Paint shop:  The employer did not provide training on the respirator for the employee mandated to wear a full face mask respirator while spraying in the paint shop.

Issued

Feb 19, 2016

Abate by

Mar 16, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a) Throughout the shop: The employer did not establish or implement a written hazard communication program for employees using chemicals such as, but not limited to,Transtar LV-234, Transtar 6587, Transtar 6561, Transtar 6231, Tek-Elite MRS-31 and Tek-Elite MRS-90 while working in the body shop.

Issued

Feb 19, 2016

Abate by

Mar 16, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use:  a) Throughout the shop: The employer did not provide safety data sheets for employees using chemicals such as, but not limited to,Transtar LV-234, Transtar 6587, Transtar 6561, Transtar 6231, Tek-Elite MRS-31 and Tek-Elite MRS-90 while working in the body shop.

Issued

Feb 19, 2016

Abate by

Mar 16, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a) Throughout the shop: The employer did not provide training for employees using chemicals such as, but not limited to,Transtar LV-234, Transtar 6587, Transtar 6561, Transtar 6231, Tek-Elite MRS-31 and Tek-Elite MRS-90 while working in the body shop.