AUBURN, IL ·
OSHA Inspection: DALLAS J. GRESHAM
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of DALLAS J. GRESHAM in 926 W JACKSON, AUBURN, IL 62615 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341011708.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DALLAS J. GRESHAM
- Site address
- 926 W JACKSON
- City
- AUBURN
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62615
- Mailing
- 420 W DOUGLAS, GREENVIEW, IL 62642
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2015
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part: Employees were exposed to fall hazards and eye injuries while performing roofing work and the employer did not maintain an accident prevention program.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2015
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not provide frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials, and equipment by a competent person: Employees were exposed to fall hazards while performing roofing work and a competent person did not conduct an inspection of the job site and take action to address hazards in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2015
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment was not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury: An employee was operating a pneumatic nail gun installing shingles on a residential roof and the employer did not ensure the employee wore safety glasses while operating the nail gun.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.501 B11
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2015
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: Employees were exposed to a fall hazard up to 14 feet while installing roofing material and each employee was not protected by a guardrail system, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2015
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were other provisions of paragraph (b) of this section used to provide an alternative fall protection measure: Employees were exposed to a fall hazard up to 10 feet while removing and installing roofing material on a detached garage at a residential home and a suitable fall protection system was not used.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2015
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: Employees were exposed to a fall hazard when using a ladder to access the roof of a detached garage at a residential home and the side rails did not extend at least 3 feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.1060 A01 III
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2015
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1)(iii): The employer did not ensure that each employee using ladders had been trained by a competent person in the proper construction, use, placement, and care in handling of all ladders: Employees were exposed to fall hazards because the side rails of the ladder did not extend at least three feet above the eave and leaned up against the gable end of the garage, and the employer had not ensured that each employee had been trained by a competent person.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341011708.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.