OGDENSBURG, NY ·
OSHA Inspection: DEFELSKO CORPORATION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DEFELSKO CORPORATION in 800 PROCTOR AVE., OGDENSBURG, NY 13669 (NAICS 334519). OSHA activity number 341017481.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DEFELSKO CORPORATION
- Site address
- 800 PROCTOR AVE.
- City
- OGDENSBURG
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 13669
- Mailing
- 800 PROCTOR AVE., OGDENSBURG, NY 13669
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 334519
- Employees
- 70
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 14, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): a) Machine Shop, on or about 10/27/2015: Employees are operating machinery such as but not limited to a lathe which produces flying particles without using personal protective equipment.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 14, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: a) Machine Shop, on or about 10/27/2015: Employees are operating machinery such as but not limited to a lathe which produces flying particles without using eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 14, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a) Machine Shop, on or about 10/27/2015: South Bend lathe was operated without a guard over the rotating chuck. b) Machine Shop, on or about 10/27/2015: Hardinge lathe was operated without a guard to protect employee from flying chips. c) Machine Shop, on or about 10/27/2015: Hardinge Chuck lathe was operated without a guard over the rotating chuck. d) Machine Shop, on or about 10/27/2015: Hardinge lathe was operated without a guard to protect employee from flying chips. e) Machine Shop, on or about 10/27/2015: Clausing drill press was operated without a guard over the rotating chuck. f) Machine Shop, on or about 10/27/2015: Atlas drill press was operated without a guard over the rotating chuck. g) Machine Shop, on or about 10/27/2015: EMCO milling machine was operated without a guard over the rotating bit.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2450
- · Z (S) $3500
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 7, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling: a) Machine Shop, on or about 10/27/2015: Two multi tap receptacles were used to provide power to equipment such as drill press. Employees are exposed to a fire hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $2100
1910.304 G05
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 7, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.304(g)(5): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures was not permanent, continuous, and effective: a) Machine Shop, on or about 10/27/2015: A metal case fan was not provided with a continuous path to ground.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.1025 M01 III
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 14, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(m)(1)(iii): The employer did not include lead in the hazard communication program established to comply with the HCS (� 1910.1200), and the employer did not ensure that each employee had access to labels on containers of lead and to safety data sheets, and that employees were trained on lead in accordance with the requirements of HCS and paragraph (l) of this section. a) At the Facility, on or about 10/27/2015: Employees working with lead has not been provided with a lead section in the hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections at Defelsko Corporation
View Defelsko Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 334519)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341017481.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.