Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: PETERSON CONCRETE SEPTIC TANKS & STORM SHELTERS

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of PETERSON CONCRETE SEPTIC TANKS & STORM SHELTERS in 6227 HIGHWAY 64 E, POTTSVILLE, AR 72858 (NAICS 327390). OSHA activity number 341018547.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Peterson Concrete Septic Tanks & Storm Shelters — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Peterson Concrete Septic Tanks & Storm Shelters is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6227 HIGHWAY 64 E
City
POTTSVILLE
State
AR
ZIP
72858
Mailing
6227 HIGHWAY 64 E, POTTSVILLE, AR 72858
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
327390
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 27, 2015
Abate by
Dec 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition.    The floors of the metal corrugated building were not kept clean and orderly with concrete and other debris throughout the flooring, exposing employees to tripping and.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2400

1910.179 J02 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 27, 2015
Abate by
Dec 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2)(iii): Monthly inspections of hooks, with a certification record which includes the date of inspection, the signature of the person who performed the inspection and the serial number, or other identifier, of the hook inspected, were not performed:    The employer did not perform monthly inspections of hooks with a certification record retained to include the date of inspection, signature of person who performed the inspection, and the serial number or other identifier of the hook inspected.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.179 J02 IV

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 27, 2015
Abate by
Dec 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2)(iv): Monthly inspections of hoist chains, with a certification record which includes the date of inspection, the signature of the person who performed the inspection and an identifier of the chain which was inspected, were not performed:  The employer did not perform monthly inspections of hoist chains or maintain a certification record to include the date of the inspection, signature of the person who performed the inspection and an identifier for the chain inspected.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.179 K02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 27, 2015
Abate by
Dec 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.179(k)(2): Rated load test reports were not placed on file where they were readily available to appointed personnel:    The employer did not perform rated load tests for the overhead crane which consisted of a 5 ton Yale hoist with model number BEW5X20RT1504 and serial number U307288A on a runway.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.303 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 27, 2015
Abate by
Dec 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2): Each service, feeder, and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or overcurrent device, was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, nor located and arranged so the purpose was evident:]    The employer did not ensure that each service, feeder, and branch circuit at it's disconnecting means or overcurrent device for the main panel, air compressor, hoist, and mixer were legibly marked to indicate their purpose.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.305 C04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 27, 2015
Abate by
Dec 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(c)(4): Snap switches mounted in boxes did not have faceplates installed so as to completely cover the opening and seat against the finished surface.     A snap switch for lighting in the metal corrugated building did not have a faceplate installed to cover the opening, exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2400

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 27, 2015
Abate by
Dec 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    The employer had not developed, implemented, and maintained a written hazard communication program for the chemicals used in the workplace to include but not limited to concrete mix, form oil, hydraulic oil, and diesel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2400

1904.39 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 27, 2015
Abate by
Dec 7, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,000 · Current $500 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2): The employer did not report an in-patient hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye as a result of a work-related incident to OSHA within twenty-four (24) hours.    The employer had not reported an in-patient hospitalization and loss of an eye as a result of a work-related incident occurring on October 23, 2015 within 24 hours.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $500
  • — Z (O) $1000

1910.36 G02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 27, 2015
Abate by
Dec 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.36(g)(2): Exit access(es) were not at least 28 inches (71.1 cm) wide at all points.  The walkways in the facility giving access to exits were not at least 28 inches wide at all points limiting egress in the event of an emergency.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.157 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 27, 2015
Abate by
Dec 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(1): The employer shall be responsible for the inspection, maintenance and testing of all portable fire extinguishers in the workplace:  The employer did not ensure an inspection, maintenance, and testing was performed on all portable fire extinguishers in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341018547.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.