Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: U-HAUL COMPANY OF ST. LOUIS

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of U-HAUL COMPANY OF ST. LOUIS in 418 SOUTH TUCKER BLVD., SAINT LOUIS, MO 63103 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 341021475.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch U-Haul Company of ST. Louis — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for U-Haul Company of ST. Louis is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
418 SOUTH TUCKER BLVD.
City
SAINT LOUIS
State
MO
ZIP
63103
Mailing
418 SOUTH TUCKER BLVD., SAINT LOUIS, MO 63103
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 4, 2016
Abate by
Mar 2, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATION/CONDITION) (DESCRIBE HAZARD) Note:  The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.  On or about 10/20/2015, medical evaluation was not performed for employees who wore air purifying respirators while conducting grinding operation on window sills that contained Lead, Cadmium and Arsenic.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $4000

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 4, 2016
Abate by
Mar 2, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATION/CONDITION) (DESCRIBE HAZARD)  On or 10/20/2015, the employer did not provide fit testing for employees who wore tight fitting respirators during grinding operations of window sills that contained Arsenic, Cadmium and Lead.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 4, 2016
Abate by
Mar 2, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace:    On or 10/20/2015, employees who were provided and required to wear respirators tight fitting during grinding activities of widow sills that contained Lead, Arsenic and Cadmium were not given training on proper use of the respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $4000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341021475.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.