Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ANDREWS FABRICATION, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ANDREWS FABRICATION, INC. in 1528 MOONEY RD, HOUSTON, TX 77093 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 341024040.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Andrews Fabrication, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Andrews Fabrication, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1528 MOONEY RD
City
HOUSTON
State
TX
ZIP
77093
Mailing
1528 MOONEY RD, HOUSTON, TX 77093
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332710
Employees
19
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2015
Abate by
Feb 18, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace.    On or about October 29, 2015, and times prior thereto, employees throughout the shop area were exposed to a struck-by hazard when operating forklifts without formal instruction and evaluation of the operator's performance.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1600
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2015
Abate by
Feb 18, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    On or about October 28, 2015, in the central shop area, employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard when operating a JET Equipment & Tools lathe, Model No. CBS-1336, without a chuck guard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2015
Abate by
Feb 18, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): The  point of operation of machines whose operation exposed an employee to injury, was not guarded:    On or about October 29, 2015, employees in the shop area were exposed to a struck-by hazard when operating a Wysong shear, Model 1025-G, S/N G1-103, without a point of operation guard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.253 B04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2015
Abate by
Feb 18, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(4)(iii): Oxygen cylinders in storage were not separated from fuel-gas cylinders or combustible materials (especially oil or grease), a minimum distance of 20 feet (6.1 m) or by a noncombustible barrier at least 5 feet (1.5 m) high having a fire-resistance rating of at least:    On or about October 29, 2015, along the south central wall, employees were exposed to fire hazards when oxygen cylinders were stored without being separated from fuel cylinders a minimum of 20 feet or by a noncombustible barrier.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.134 C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2015
Abate by
Jan 21, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use:  On or about October 29, 2015, and times prior thereto, employees in the Powder Coating area were allowed to wear Gerson half-face respirators without a written respiratory protection program containing worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 19 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2015
Abate by
Jan 21, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  On or about October 28, 2015, and times prior there, employees throughout the shop area used and stored hazardous chemicals without the employer developing, implementing, and/or maintaining at the workplace a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341024040.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.