HOUSTON, TX —
OSHA Inspection: ANDREWS FABRICATION, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ANDREWS FABRICATION, INC. in 1528 MOONEY RD, HOUSTON, TX 77093 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 341024040.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ANDREWS FABRICATION, INC.
- Site address
- 1528 MOONEY RD
- City
- HOUSTON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77093
- Mailing
- 1528 MOONEY RD, HOUSTON, TX 77093
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332710
- Employees
- 19
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 L02 II
- Issued
- Dec 31, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace. On or about October 29, 2015, and times prior thereto, employees throughout the shop area were exposed to a struck-by hazard when operating forklifts without formal instruction and evaluation of the operator's performance.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1600
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Dec 31, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: On or about October 28, 2015, in the central shop area, employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard when operating a JET Equipment & Tools lathe, Model No. CBS-1336, without a chuck guard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $960
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Dec 31, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): The point of operation of machines whose operation exposed an employee to injury, was not guarded: On or about October 29, 2015, employees in the shop area were exposed to a struck-by hazard when operating a Wysong shear, Model 1025-G, S/N G1-103, without a point of operation guard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.253 B04 III
- Issued
- Dec 31, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(4)(iii): Oxygen cylinders in storage were not separated from fuel-gas cylinders or combustible materials (especially oil or grease), a minimum distance of 20 feet (6.1 m) or by a noncombustible barrier at least 5 feet (1.5 m) high having a fire-resistance rating of at least: On or about October 29, 2015, along the south central wall, employees were exposed to fire hazards when oxygen cylinders were stored without being separated from fuel cylinders a minimum of 20 feet or by a noncombustible barrier.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.134 C
- Issued
- Dec 31, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use: On or about October 29, 2015, and times prior thereto, employees in the Powder Coating area were allowed to wear Gerson half-face respirators without a written respiratory protection program containing worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Dec 31, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: On or about October 28, 2015, and times prior there, employees throughout the shop area used and stored hazardous chemicals without the employer developing, implementing, and/or maintaining at the workplace a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332710)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341024040.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.