Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BENCO PRECISION MACHINING INC

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of BENCO PRECISION MACHINING INC in 10 POND ROAD, GLOUCESTER, MA 01930 (NAICS 332119). OSHA activity number 341027548.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Benco Precision Machining INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Benco Precision Machining INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
10 POND ROAD
City
GLOUCESTER
State
MA
ZIP
01930
Mailing
10 POND ROAD, GLOUCESTER, MA 01930
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332119
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2015
Abate by
Dec 15, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    Location: Shop    On or about October 29, 2015, the side guard of the CNC milling machine was not in place during the operation of the machine.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $600
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.215 A02

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2015
Abate by
Jan 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(2): Abrasive wheel(s) used on grinding machinery were not provided with safety guard(s) which covered the spindle end, nut, flange projections:    Location: Shop    On or about October 29, 2015, abrasive wheels used for deburring were not properly guarded with guards covering the outside of the wheels.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2015
Abate by
Dec 10, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    Location: facility    On or about October 29, 2015, the employer did not have a written hazard communication program for employees who work with chemicals such as but not limited to 2-butoxyethanol.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $600
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2015
Abate by
Dec 10, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use:  Location: Facility  On or about October 29, 2015, the employer did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical such as but not limited to 2-butoxyethanol that they use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2015
Abate by
Dec 10, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  Location: Production  On or about October 29, 2015, employees were not provided effective information and training regarding the hazards of the chemicals they work with such as but not limited to 2-butoxyethanol.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 F05 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2015
Abate by
Dec 10, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein:    Location: Shop    On or about October 29, 2015, containers of degreaser, containing 2-butoxyethanol, were not marked as to the identity of the product.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 F05 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2015
Abate by
Dec 10, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings:  Location: Shop  On or about October 29, 2015, containers of degreaser, containing 2-butoxyethanol, were not marked as to the hazards of the product.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341027548.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.