Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: M. DAVILA D.M.D INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of M. DAVILA D.M.D INC. in 112 SOUTH WHITNEY ST., HARTFORD, CT 06105 (NAICS 621210). OSHA activity number 341032316.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch M. Davila D.M.D INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for M. Davila D.M.D INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
112 SOUTH WHITNEY ST.
City
HARTFORD
State
CT
ZIP
06105
Mailing
112 SOUTH WHITNEY ST., HARTFORD, CT 06105
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
621210
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1030 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 31, 2016
Abate by
May 17, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1): 1030(c)(1)(i): At this establishment, the employer had not established a written blood borne pathogen exposure program designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure when treating injuries.  Dental Office  On or about 11/3/15, the employer did not have a written exposure control plan that included an exposure determination and methods of compliance with all parts of the standard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.1030 C02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 31, 2016
Abate by
May 17, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(2)(i): The employer having employees with occupational exposure did not prepare an exposure determination:  Dental Office  On or about 11/3/16, the employer did not have an exposure determination for all tasks performed by the dental assistants that could result in exposure such as cleaning contaminated instruments and surfaces.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 D04 III A 1

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 31, 2016
Abate by
May 17, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(4)(iii)(A)(1): Contaminated sharps were not immediately discarded in containers that were closable, puncture resistant, leakproof and labeled or color-coded according paragraph g(1)(i) of this standard:  Dental Office, Sterilization Room  On or about 11/3/15, contaminated sharps were being collected in an open bucket without appropriate labels and warnings on it.  Dental assistants worked in the lab, in close proximity to the bucket, when decontaminating instruments.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 31, 2016
Abate by
May 17, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(1)(i)(A): Warning labels were not affixed to containers used to store, transport or ship blood or other potentially infectious materials  Dental Office, Sterilization Room  On or about 11/3/15, an open five gallon plastic bucket that was used to collect used sharps did not have a label indicating that it contained potentially infectious materials.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1096 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 31, 2016
Abate by
May 17, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1096(d)(1): The employer did not make such surveys as necessary to evaluate the radiation hazards incident to the production, use, release, disposal or presence of radioactive materials or other sources of radiation under a specific set of conditions:          Dental Office, Exam Rooms  On or about 11/3/15, the employer did not have radiation surveys available for the two x-ray machines that are used in the dental practice.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.1096 D02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 31, 2016
Abate by
May 17, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1096(d)(2): Appropriate personnel monitoring or equipment such as film badges, pocket chambers, pocket dosimeters of film rings were not supplied to or required to be used by employee(s) as described in 29 CFR 1910.1096(d)(2)(i),(d)(2)(ii) and (d)(2)(iii):  Dental Office, Exam Rooms With X-rays  On or about 11/3/15, the employer was not providing dosimeters/film badges to monitor the exposure to ionizing radiation of the dental assistants that routinely took x-rays in the dental exam rooms.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 31, 2016
Abate by
May 17, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  Dental Office  On or about 11/3/15, the employer did not have a written hazard communication plan that described how the requirements of the hazard communication regulation would be met.  Employees regularly use Cavicide, which contains isopropanol and ethanol to disinfect surfaces and items in the office.  This chemical can cause severe eye irritation, skin irritation, dizziness and drowsiness.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 31, 2016
Abate by
May 17, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work  shift to employees when they were in their work area(s)  Dental Office  On or about 11/3/15, the employer did not make safety data sheets readily accessible for employees who use hazardous chemicals, including but not limited to, Cavicide.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 31, 2016
Abate by
May 17, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  Dental Office  On or about 11/3/15, the employer did not provide effective training in hazard communication including, where to find safety data sheets, how to read safety data sheets, chemical labeling and pictograms per the updated GHS standard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341032316.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.