HARTFORD, CT —
OSHA Inspection: M. DAVILA D.M.D INC.
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of M. DAVILA D.M.D INC. in 112 SOUTH WHITNEY ST., HARTFORD, CT 06105 (NAICS 621210). OSHA activity number 341032316.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- M. DAVILA D.M.D INC.
- Site address
- 112 SOUTH WHITNEY ST.
- City
- HARTFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06105
- Mailing
- 112 SOUTH WHITNEY ST., HARTFORD, CT 06105
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 621210
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1030 C01
- Issued
- Mar 31, 2016
- Abate by
- May 17, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1): 1030(c)(1)(i): At this establishment, the employer had not established a written blood borne pathogen exposure program designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure when treating injuries. Dental Office On or about 11/3/15, the employer did not have a written exposure control plan that included an exposure determination and methods of compliance with all parts of the standard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.1030 C02 I
- Issued
- Mar 31, 2016
- Abate by
- May 17, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(2)(i): The employer having employees with occupational exposure did not prepare an exposure determination: Dental Office On or about 11/3/16, the employer did not have an exposure determination for all tasks performed by the dental assistants that could result in exposure such as cleaning contaminated instruments and surfaces.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 D04 III A 1
- Issued
- Mar 31, 2016
- Abate by
- May 17, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(4)(iii)(A)(1): Contaminated sharps were not immediately discarded in containers that were closable, puncture resistant, leakproof and labeled or color-coded according paragraph g(1)(i) of this standard: Dental Office, Sterilization Room On or about 11/3/15, contaminated sharps were being collected in an open bucket without appropriate labels and warnings on it. Dental assistants worked in the lab, in close proximity to the bucket, when decontaminating instruments.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 G01 I A
- Issued
- Mar 31, 2016
- Abate by
- May 17, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(1)(i)(A): Warning labels were not affixed to containers used to store, transport or ship blood or other potentially infectious materials Dental Office, Sterilization Room On or about 11/3/15, an open five gallon plastic bucket that was used to collect used sharps did not have a label indicating that it contained potentially infectious materials.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1096 D01
- Issued
- Mar 31, 2016
- Abate by
- May 17, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1096(d)(1): The employer did not make such surveys as necessary to evaluate the radiation hazards incident to the production, use, release, disposal or presence of radioactive materials or other sources of radiation under a specific set of conditions: Dental Office, Exam Rooms On or about 11/3/15, the employer did not have radiation surveys available for the two x-ray machines that are used in the dental practice.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.1096 D02
- Issued
- Mar 31, 2016
- Abate by
- May 17, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1096(d)(2): Appropriate personnel monitoring or equipment such as film badges, pocket chambers, pocket dosimeters of film rings were not supplied to or required to be used by employee(s) as described in 29 CFR 1910.1096(d)(2)(i),(d)(2)(ii) and (d)(2)(iii): Dental Office, Exam Rooms With X-rays On or about 11/3/15, the employer was not providing dosimeters/film badges to monitor the exposure to ionizing radiation of the dental assistants that routinely took x-rays in the dental exam rooms.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Mar 31, 2016
- Abate by
- May 17, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: Dental Office On or about 11/3/15, the employer did not have a written hazard communication plan that described how the requirements of the hazard communication regulation would be met. Employees regularly use Cavicide, which contains isopropanol and ethanol to disinfect surfaces and items in the office. This chemical can cause severe eye irritation, skin irritation, dizziness and drowsiness.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Mar 31, 2016
- Abate by
- May 17, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s) Dental Office On or about 11/3/15, the employer did not make safety data sheets readily accessible for employees who use hazardous chemicals, including but not limited to, Cavicide.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Mar 31, 2016
- Abate by
- May 17, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: Dental Office On or about 11/3/15, the employer did not provide effective training in hazard communication including, where to find safety data sheets, how to read safety data sheets, chemical labeling and pictograms per the updated GHS standard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 621210)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341032316.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.