SAINT AUGUSTINE, FL —
OSHA Inspection: ORQUICELY CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ORQUICELY CONSTRUCTION, LLC in 77 SPANISH BAY DR, SAINT AUGUSTINE, FL 32092 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 341036796.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ORQUICELY CONSTRUCTION, LLC
- Site address
- 77 SPANISH BAY DR
- City
- SAINT AUGUSTINE
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32092
- Mailing
- 4046 N. GOLDENROD RD, #272, WINTER PARK, FL 32792
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 B01 I
- Issued
- Jan 21, 2016
- Abate by
- Feb 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,640 · Current $2,640
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1)(i): Each platform unit (e.g., scaffold plank, fabricated plank, fabricated deck, or fabricated platform) was not installed so that the space between adjacent units and the space between the platform and the uprights were no more than 1 inch (2.5 cm) wide, except where the employer can demonstrate that a wider space is necessary: a. On or about November 4, 2015, on the second level of the scaffolds at the front side of the house, employees applying stucco cement were exposed to a 13 feet fall hazard in that the scaffolds were not fully planked. b. On or about November 4, 2015, on the second level of the scaffold at the southwest corner of the house, employees applying stucco cement were exposed to a 13 feet fall hazard in that the scaffolds were not fully planked. c. On or about November 4, 2015, on the second level of the scaffold at the north side of the house, employees applying stucco cement were exposed to a 13 feet fall hazard in that the scaffolds were not fully planked.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2640
- — C (S) $2640
- — Z (S) $2640
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Jan 21, 2016
- Abate by
- Feb 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Endframes were used as a means of access: a. On or about November 4, 2015, along the south side of the garage, a means of access was not installed for employees who accessed the second level of the scaffold by climbing the endframes, exposing themselves to a 13 feet fall hazard.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Jan 21, 2016
- Abate by
- Feb 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level: a. On or about November 4, 2015, on the second levels of the three scaffolds erected on the east side of the house, employees were exposed to 13 feet fall hazards in that the scaffolds were missing top rails, mid rails, and end rails. b. On or about November 4, 2015, on the second level of the scaffold erected on the southwest corner of the house, employees applying stucco were exposed to a 13 feet fall hazard in that the scaffold was missing an end rail.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.454 B
- Issued
- Jan 21, 2016
- Abate by
- Feb 17, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee who was involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work: a. On or about November 4, 2015, on the job site, plastering employees involved in erecting, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, and inspecting scaffold systems were not trained to recognize hazards of incomplete guardrails, planking, and ladder access.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1051 A
- Issued
- Jan 21, 2016
- Abate by
- Feb 2, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,080 · Current $3,080
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): Stairway(s) or ladder(s) were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, or no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided: a. On or about November 4, 2015, on the 6:12 pitch roof over the garage, a ladder or stairway was not provided to access the second-story roof. An employee was exposed to a 10 feet fall hazard while using an A-frame scaffold frame to climb to the second story roof.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $3080
- — C (S) $3080
- — Z (S) $3080
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jan 21, 2016
- Abate by
- Feb 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $10,780 · Current $10,780
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, a personal fall arrest system, or an alternative fall protection measure as provided by another provision in paragraph (b) of this section: a. Employees installing stucco at elevations of six feet or more above the ground are not being protected from fall hazards by a fall protection system. The employer fails to assure effective protection against falls as required by the standard, as demonstrated on November 4, 2015, on the 6:12 pitch roof over the garage, an employee placing a protective tarp was exposed to a 10 feet fall hazard from the eave, and on the 6:12 second story roof above the front entrance, an employee placing a protective tarp was exposed to a 20 feet fall hazard from the eave in that they were not protected by any fall protection systems. Orquicely Construction, LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1042322, citation number 01, item number 001 and was affirmed as a final order on May 12, 2015, with respect to a workplace located at 23 Forest Edge Dr, Saint Johns, Florida.
Recent events (3)
- — F (R) $10780
- — C (R) $10780
- — Z (R) $10780
More inspections at Orquicely Construction, LLC
View Orquicely Construction, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341036796.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.