Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BALDEMAR MARTINEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BALDEMAR MARTINEZ in 3612 ENFIELD RD, AUSTIN, TX 78703 (NAICS 238110). OSHA activity number 341039402.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Baldemar Martinez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Baldemar Martinez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
BALDEMAR MARTINEZ
Site address
3612 ENFIELD RD
City
AUSTIN
State
TX
ZIP
78703
Mailing
209 FORREST LAKE DR., DEL VALLE, TX 78617
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238110
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 2, 2016
Abate by
May 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:    On or about November 5, 2015, and at times prior thereto, 5 employees were not wearing head protection while performing construction work, exposing employees to the hazard of being struck by falling materials such as foundation frame work, building materials and rocks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.451 A06

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 2, 2016
Abate by
May 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person:     On or about November 5, 2015, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that the scaffolding system installed around the foundation frame work and used on site was designed by a qualified person, exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 10 feet. Some defects observed on the scaffolding were a lack of guardrails, ladders, toe boards.  In addition, the planks were only six inches wide.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.451 B02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 2, 2016
Abate by
May 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2): Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (b)(2)(ii) of this section, each scaffold platform and walkway was not at least 18 inches (46 cm) wide.  On or about November 5, 2015, and at times prior thereto, the employer was using 2 X 6 pieces of wood in various lengths as scaffolding planks, exposing employees to fall hazards of up to approximately 10 feet. The planks were used along the west and south sides of the foundation formwork.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 2, 2016
Abate by
May 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): Portable ladder, hook-on ladder, attachable ladder, stair tower, stairway-type ladder, ramp, runway, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from another scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used to access scaffold platform more than 2 feet above or below a point of access:  On or about November 5, 2015, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not provide a ladder to gain access to the scaffolding system, exposing employees to a fall hazard up to approximately 10 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 2, 2016
Abate by
May 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1):  Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level was not protected from falling to that lower level:  On or about November 5, 2015, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that the scaffolding system installed around the foundation had guardrails installed, exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 10 feet. The guardrails were missing along the southwest corner foundation formwork.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 2, 2016
Abate by
May 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.     On or about November 5, 2015 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that workers on a scaffold platform were trained to recognize unsafe conditions, exposing employees to the hazards of falls and/or collapse/failure of the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.651 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 2, 2016
Abate by
May 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.651(c)(2): A stairway, ladder, ramp or other safe means of egress was not located in trench excavations that were 4 feet (1.22m) or more in depth so as to require no more than 25 feet (7.62m) of lateral travel for employees:    On or about November 5, 2015, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not provide ladders for the employees to use to exit the excavation around the foundation under construction. Ladders were needed along all four sides of the excavation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.651 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 2, 2016
Abate by
May 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.651(h)(1): Employees were working in excavations in which there was accumulated water, or excavations in which water was accumulating, and adequate precautions had not been taken to protect employees against the hazards posed by water accumulation.  On or about November 5, 2015, and at times prior there to, there were five employees working in and around the excavation site while there was standing water in the excavation, exposing the employees to the hazards of cave-ins and structural collapse. Water was observed in the excavation on the southwest corner.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.651 K01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 2, 2016
Abate by
May 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.651(k)(1): Daily inspections of excavations, the adjacent areas, and protective systems were not made by a competent person for evidence of a situation that could result in possible cave-ins, indications of failure of protective systems, hazardous atmospheres, or other hazardous conditions. An inspection was not conducted by the competent person prior to the start of work and as needed throughout the shift.  On or about November 5, 2015 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that the competent person in charge on site conducted an inspection of the excavation before allowing employees to enter it, exposing the employees to the hazard of a cave-in.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.652 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 2, 2016
Abate by
May 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.652(a)(1): Each employee in an excavation was not protected from cave-ins by an adequate protective system designed in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.652(b) or 1926.652(c):    On or about November 5, 2015 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure adequate protective systems such as sloping, benching, or shielding were used to protect employees from a possible collapse of the excavation wall in the following instances:    a. Along the north wall of the excavation at a depth of approximately 11 feet.  b. Along the west wall of the excavation at a depth of approximately 6 feet.  c. Along the south wall of the excavation at a depth of approximately 9 feet with standing water in the bottom.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341039402.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.