WASHINGTON, DC ·
OSHA Inspection: KEITH ROOFING
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of KEITH ROOFING in 232 16TH. ST., SE, WASHINGTON, DC 20020 (NAICS 423330). OSHA activity number 341039816.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KEITH ROOFING
- Site address
- 232 16TH. ST., SE
- City
- WASHINGTON
- State
- DC
- ZIP
- 20020
- Mailing
- 611 PENNSYLVANIA AVE., SE, SUITE 248, WASHINGTON, DC 20002
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 423330
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) Porch Roof On or about 11/02/2015, three roofers installing a new roof on a small, low-sloped roof, were exposed to a 14 foot fall for they had not been provided with fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1100
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder: a) Porch Roof - A 24 foot aluminum extension ladder used by roofers to access a small roof extended only 2 feet above the ladder landing, was not secured in place and was not provided with a grabrail thereby exposing the roofers to a 14 foot fall hazard. No abatement certification or documentation required for this item.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1100
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify fall protection training by preparing a written certification record: a) Job Site The employer did not provide the Secretary or his representative with written certification verifying that roofers installing a new roof and exposed to a 14 foot fall hazard had received fall protection training.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 423330)
More inspections in DC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341039816.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.