Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RENO MACHINE COMPANY, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of RENO MACHINE COMPANY, INC. in 170 PANE ROAD, NEWINGTON, CT 06111 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 341041788.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Reno Machine Company, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Reno Machine Company, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
170 PANE ROAD
City
NEWINGTON
State
CT
ZIP
06111
Mailing
170 PANE ROAD, NEWINGTON, CT 06111
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332710
Employees
48
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.36 D01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Apr 1, 2016
Abate by
Apr 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.36(d)(1): Employee(s) were not able to open an exit route door from the inside at all times without keys, tools, or special knowledge:    PRODUCTION AREA:    Emergency exits in the following locations were locked with sliding bolts exposing employees to injury including, but not limited to, smoke inhalation in the event of fire or other emergency.    A.  On or about November 6, 2015, the emergency exit located on the north wall of the Machine Shop, immediately adjacent to the maintenance area    B.  On or about December 2, 2015 and December 21, 2015, the emergency exit located near the compressor room in the southeast corner of the building
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.37 A03

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 1, 2016
Abate by
Apr 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,520 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed:    PRODUCTION AREAS:    A.  On or about November 6, 2015, the route to the emergency exit in the Machine Shop was blocked by a forklift and a manufactured large steel ring.    B.  On or about December 2, 2015, the emergency exit in the northwest wall of the Machine Shop was blocked by a 24-foot length of 4-inch aluminum pipe.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2520
  • — Z (S) $4200

1910.101 B

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.101(b): The in-plant handling, storage, and utilization of all compressed gases in cylinders, portable tanks, rail tankcars, or motor vehicle cargo tanks were not in accordance with Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet P-1-1965, which is incorporated by reference as specified in CFR 1910.6:    WELDING AREA:    A)  On or about December 21, 2015, an unsecured compressed gas cylinder containing argon that was in use was not properly supported to prevent it from being knocked over (REF: CGA Pamphlet P-1-1965, Section 3.4.4).    B)  On or about December 21, 2015, a compressed gas cylinder in storage was subject to falling or being knocked over by pedestrian traffic or moving equipment (REF: CGA Pamphlet P-1-1965, Section 3.3.1; REF: CGA Pamphlet P-1-2006, Section 5.7.4).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.106 E09 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Apr 1, 2016
Abate by
May 18, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(9)(iii): Combustible waste material and residues in a building or unit operating area were not kept to a minimum, stored in covered metal receptacles and disposed of daily:    PRODUCTION AREAS:    On or about December 21, 2015, employees were exposed to potential fire hazards from rags contaminated with flammable and/or combustible liquids kept at their work stations instead of placing the rags in safety cans.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1260
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.176 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 1, 2016
Abate by
May 18, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.176(c): Storage areas were not kept free from accumulation of materials that constituted hazards from tripping, fire, explosion or pest harborage:    CHEMICAL STORAGE AREA:    On or about December 21, 2015, Pentrate Touch-Up (a strong oxidizer containing nitric acid) was stored in a chemical storage cabinet with the following products that may result in a fire or explosion if mixing were to occur:    A.  Steel Blue Layout Fluid which is a flammable liquid containing ethanol, n-butanol, and isopropanol    B.  Ammonium hydroxide, a strong alkaline liquid
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.252 B02 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 1, 2016
Abate by
May 18, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(2)(iii): Workers and other persons adjacent to the welding area were not protected from the rays by noncombustible or flameproof screens or shields:    WELDING DEPARTMENT:    On or about December 21, 2015, employees working in the vicinity of welding activities were exposed to ultraviolet radiation when the welder did not surround his work area with welding screens.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Apr 1, 2016
Abate by
May 18, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    COMPANY-WIDE:    On or about December 2, 2015, the employer had not maintained their hazard communication program.  Hazardous chemicals used at the facility include, but are not limited to: welding wire containing 15.30% chromium; combustible liquids containing phenols, aliphatic amines, and petroleum hydrocarbons; and corrosive liquids containing nitric and selenious acids.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1260
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.1200 F05

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 1, 2016
Abate by
May 18, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity and appropriate hazard warnings regarding the chemicals contained therein:  PRODUCTION AREAS:  A.  On or about November 6, 2015, in the Chemical Storage Area on the south wall, there were two poly drums that had illegible labels.  One reportedly contained a disinfectant cleaner and the other contained Simple Green.  B.  On or about December 21, 2015, several 55-gallon drums containing used oil were either unlabeled or had an incorrect label.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Apr 1, 2016
Abate by
May 18, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  COMPANY-WIDE:  On or about November 6, 2015, employees had not been provided with information about the hazardous chemicals that were in use at the facility.  Hazardous chemicals observed on-site include, but are not limited to: acetone, alcohol, hexavalent chromium, and other petroleum-based solvents.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Apr 1, 2016
Abate by
May 18, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible:  PRODUCTION AREAS:  On or about November 6, 2015, employees were exposed to potential cardiopulmonary distress when they voluntarily wore tight-fitting N-95 particulate respirators without receiving training as per Appendix D of the Respiratory Protection Standard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1026 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 1, 2016
Abate by
May 18, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1): The employer with a workplace or work operation covered by this standard did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI):  WELDING AREAS:  On or about November 6, 2015, the employer had not performed an assessment to determine employee exposure to hexavalent chromium (Cr6+) while welding on stainless steel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Reno Machine Company, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341041788.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.