CORPUS CHRISTI, TX —
OSHA Inspection: FRANK'S PORT AYERS GARAGE
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of FRANK'S PORT AYERS GARAGE in 4447 AYERS STREET, CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78415 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 341047462.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FRANK'S PORT AYERS GARAGE
- Site address
- 4447 AYERS STREET
- City
- CORPUS CHRISTI
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 78415
- Mailing
- 4447 AYERS STREET, CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78415
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811121
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Dec 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 5, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures in any workplace where respirators were necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators were required by the employer: At this establishment, the employer did not develop or implement a written respiratory protection program for employees who are exposed to fumes during painting and welding repairs to automobiles.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1440
- — Z (S) $2400
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Dec 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 5, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: The employer did not provide a medical evaluation as required for employees who wear half-face respirators while painting or while welding in the automotive body repair section.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Dec 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 5, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: The employer did not have employees fit tested prior to employees wearing respirators while painting or welding in the automotive body repair section of the establishment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 H02 I
- Issued
- Dec 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 5, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve: At this establishment, located on the north wall of the automotive body repair (collision) shop, a half-face respirator was being stored in a tool box drawer without protection from dust, oil, dirt, and moisture.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Dec 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 5, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $240 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: At this location employees were engaged in an automotive repair operations were exposed to hazardous chemicals, such as but not limited to, Wanda primer/sealer, Wanda hardeners containing isocyanates, Wanda clear coat, and Wanda base containing butyl acetate and xylene. The employer did not developed a program which would address labeling and other forms of warning on chemical containers, Safety Data Sheets, and employee information and training on the hazards associated with chemicals used at this site. The written program must also contain the following: 1. a list of all hazardous chemicals on site, 2. the methods the employer will use to inform employees of the hazards associated with non-routine tasks involving chemicals, such as a spill, 3. the hazards of chemicals contained in piping that is not labeled and 4. the method the employer will use to inform other employers (contractors) of the chemicals their employees might be exposed to while performing duties at this site.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $240
- — Z (O) $400
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Dec 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 5, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $240 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use: The employer did not have safety data sheets (SDS's). The employer is an automotive and collision repair shop that uses flammables and organic compounds throughout many processes, such as but not limited to, lubricants, solvents, and paints.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $240
- — Z (O) $400
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Dec 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 5, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $240 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: The employer did not train employees on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment. The employer is an automotive and collision repair shop that uses flammables and organic compounds throughout many processes, such as but not limited to, lubricants, solvents, and paints.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $240
- — Z (O) $400
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811121)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341047462.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.