Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MULTICRAFT, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MULTICRAFT, INC. in 4701 LAKESIDE AVE., CLEVELAND, OH 44114 (NAICS 423830). OSHA activity number 341054351.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Multicraft, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Multicraft, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MULTICRAFT, INC.
Site address
4701 LAKESIDE AVE.
City
CLEVELAND
State
OH
ZIP
44114
Mailing
4701 LAKESIDE AVE., CLEVELAND, OH 44114
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423830
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.38 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Nov 25, 2015
Abate by
Dec 16, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.38(b): An emergency action plan was not in writing, kept in the workplace, and available to employees for review:    On or about November 13, 2015, the employer had not developed and implemented an emergency action plan.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $900
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 25, 2015
Abate by
Dec 16, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:     On or about November 13, 2015, where employees were required to wear full face respirators while grinding frames, the employer had not developed and implemented a written respiratory protection program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 25, 2015
Abate by
Dec 16, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:     On or about November 13, 2015, employees required to wear full face air purifying respirators while grinding frames had not received a medical evaluation prior to respirator use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 25, 2015
Abate by
Dec 16, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:     On or about November 13, 2015, employees required to wear full face air purifying respirators while grinding frames had not been fit tested.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 25, 2015
Abate by
Dec 16, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide respirator training that would ensure each employee could demonstrate knowledge of items in section (i)-(vii):     On or about November 13, 2015, employees required to wear full face air purifying respirators while grinding frames had not received training in accordance with the respiratory protection standard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.243 C03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 25, 2015
Abate by
Dec 16, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.243(c)(3): Abrasive wheels used on vertical portable grinder(s) (right angle head grinders) were not provided with safety guard(s) having a maximum exposure angle of 180 degrees and located between the operator and wheel:    On or about November 13, 2015, a DeWalt Model DWE4011 Angle grinder, which is utilized by employees grinding frames, lacked a safety guard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Nov 25, 2015
Abate by
Dec 16, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):     On or about November 13, 2015, where employees work with and around chemicals including, but not limited to acetone, the employer had not developed and implemented a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $700
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 F06 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Nov 25, 2015
Abate by
Dec 16, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical:   On or about November 13, 2015, a container of acetone that is utilized when employees wipe frames was not labeled.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Nov 25, 2015
Abate by
Dec 16, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  On or about November 13, 2015, employees working with or around chemicals including, but not limited to acetone had not received hazard communication training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1904.4 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Nov 25, 2015
Abate by
Dec 16, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1904.4(a): The employer did not record each work-related fatality, injury or illness case that resulted in the general recording criteria on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent:   On or about November 12, 2015, where employees had experienced recordable injuries including, but not limited to finger lacerations, the employer had not maintained an OSHA 300 log.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Multicraft, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341054351.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.