NORTH KANSAS CITY, MO —
OSHA Inspection: GRAHAM PACKAGING COMPANY
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of GRAHAM PACKAGING COMPANY in 1253 MURRY ST, NORTH KANSAS CITY, MO 64116 (NAICS 424610). OSHA activity number 341061299.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GRAHAM PACKAGING COMPANY
- Site address
- 1253 MURRY ST
- City
- NORTH KANSAS CITY
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 64116
- Mailing
- 1253 MURRY ST, NORTH KANSAS CITY, MO 64116
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 424610
- Employees
- 60
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 D01 II
- Issued
- Feb 9, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 13, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,450 Reduced
81108111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1)(ii): Unless the employer can show that area sampling produces equivalent exposure monitoring, the employer did not use representative personal sampling to comply with the monitoring requirements of 29 CFR 1910.95(d): (a) On December 22, 2015, the employer failed to conduct representative personal noise sampling to comply with the monitoring requirements of 29 CFR 1910.95(d). (1) A machine operator employee was exposed to continuous noise levels at 164.2% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 93.5 dBA. The sampling was performed for 422 minutes during one shift on December 22, 2015; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 58 minutes not sampled. (2) A machine operator employee was exposed to continuous noise levels at 131% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 91.9 dBA. The sampling was performed for 413 minutes during one shift on December 22, 2015; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 67 minutes not sampled. (3) A packer employee was exposed to continuous noise levels at 109.2% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 90.6 dBA. The sampling was performed for 428 minutes during one shift on December 22, 2015; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 52 minutes not sampled. (4) A packer employee was exposed to continuous noise levels at 99.6 % of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 89.9 dBA. The sampling was performed for 414 minutes during one shift on December 22, 2015; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 66 minutes not sampled. Abatement certification is required for this item - use CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET for this purpose.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2450
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.1200 E01 I
- Issued
- Feb 9, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 13, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The employer did not compile a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet (a) IN THE FACILITY: the employer failed to keep an accurate list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet. Employees were exposed to hazardous chemicals including but not limited to sodium hydroxide (caustic), sulfuric acid (corrosive), phosphoric acid (corrosive), hydrochloric acid (corrosive), methanol (toxic, flammable), formaldehyde(toxic, flammable), acetone (toxic, flammable), toluene (toxic, flammable), styrene(toxic), benzene (toxic, flammable), xylene (toxic, flammable), dicyclohexylmethane-4,4' diisocyanate(toxic), and trimethylbenzene(toxic, flammable). Abatement certification is required for this item - use CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET for this purpose.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1960
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Feb 9, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 13, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s) (a) On November 17, 2015, the employer failed to ensure that required safety data sheets were readily accessible during each work shift to employees, in that members of management onsite on this date could not promptly locate the binder containing safety data sheets. Employees were exposed to hazardous chemicals including but not limited to sodium hydroxide (caustic), sulfuric acid (corrosive), phosphoric acid (corrosive), hydrochloric acid (corrosive), methanol (toxic, flammable), formaldehyde(toxic, flammable), acetone (toxic, flammable), toluene (toxic, flammable), styrene(toxic), benzene (toxic, flammable), xylene (toxic, flammable), dicyclohexylmethane-4,4' diisocyanate(toxic), and trimethylbenzene(toxic, flammable). Abatement certification is required for this item - use CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET for this purpose.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 G10
- Issued
- Feb 9, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 13, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(10): The employer did not ensure that, in all cases, the required information was provided for each hazardous chemical, and was readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s): (a) On November 17, 2015, the employer failed to ensure that required safety data sheets were readily accessible during each work shift to employees, in that members of management onsite on this date could not promptly locate the binder containing safety data sheets. Employees were exposed to hazardous chemicals including but not limited to sodium hydroxide (caustic), sulfuric acid (corrosive), phosphoric acid (corrosive), hydrochloric acid (corrosive), methanol (toxic, flammable), formaldehyde(toxic, flammable), acetone (toxic, flammable), toluene (toxic, flammable), styrene(toxic), benzene (toxic, flammable), xylene (toxic, flammable), dicyclohexylmethane-4,4' diisocyanate(toxic), and trimethylbenzene(toxic, flammable). Abatement certification is required for this item - use CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET for this purpose.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Graham Packaging Company
View Graham Packaging Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 424610)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341061299.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.