Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MEYER, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MEYER, INC. in 532 OLD SAWMILL ROAD, SOUTH SIOUX CITY, NE 68776 (NAICS 321920). OSHA activity number 341067239.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Meyer, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Meyer, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MEYER, INC.
Site address
532 OLD SAWMILL ROAD
City
SOUTH SIOUX CITY
State
NE
ZIP
68776
Mailing
P O BOX 910, SOUTH SIOUX CITY, NE 68776
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
321920
Employees
38
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2016
Abate by
Mar 4, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees:    The employer is failing to protect employees from potential struck by hazards associated with operating powered industrial trucks while not utilizing the safety equipment provided.  This was most recently evident during the inspection of the facility located at 532 Old Sawmill Road, South Sioux City, NE, where the employer has employees operating forklifts as a means of moving material and product throughout the facility without wearing the seatbelt.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1750
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2016
Abate by
Mar 4, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:     The employer is failing to protect employees from caught between and amputation hazards associated with operating and maintaining equipment that requires locking out stored energy without developing and implementing written procedures.  This was most recently evident during the inspection of the facility located at 532 Old Sawmill Road, South Sioux City, NE; where the employer has employees applying locks as means of securing hazardous stored energy without having developed and implemented written procedures that outline the step by step process necessary to safely de-energize that equipment.  Instances include but are not limited to:           i.        Employee locking out the chain conveyor has never seen or heard of written specific procedures.        ii.        Three months earlier employees locked out and worked on the Pallet Dismantling Machine without having written procedures available.       iii.        The day prior to the inspection an employee locked out and worked on both the Gang Saw and the Trim Saw, without having written procedures available.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1750
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2016
Abate by
Mar 4, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:       The employer is failing to protect employees from potential struck by hazards associated with failing to evaluate and recertify forklift operators every three years.  This was most recently evident during the inspection of the facility located at 532 Old Sawmill Road, South Sioux City, NE, where the employer has employees operating forklifts as a means of moving material and product throughout the facility without having been evaluated and certified since 2010.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1750
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2016
Abate by
Mar 4, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:    The employer is failing to protect employees from struck by hazards associated with operating a bench grinder with an improperly adjusted tongue guard.  This was most recently evident during the inspection of the facility located at 532 Old Sawmill Road, South Sioux City, NE; where the employer has employees using a Delta pedestal mounted bench grinder to sharpen tools while the tongue guard is adjusted greater than one quarter inch.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.219 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2016
Abate by
Mar 4, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(3): Sprocket wheels and chains which were seven -7 feet or less above floors or platforms were not enclosed:    The employer is failing to protect employees from in going and amputation hazards associated with working near inadequately guarded chain and sprockets.  This was most recently evident during the inspection of the facility located at 532 Old Sawmill Road, South Sioux City, NE; where the employer has employees operating the Brewer, Inc. notching machine where the operator loads the wood boards while standing in direct proximity to an inadequately guarded chain and sprocket.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1750
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2016
Abate by
Mar 4, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,050 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:     The employer is failing to protect employees from chemical hazards.  This was most recently evident during the inspection of the maintenance shed and throughout the facility located at 532 Old Sawmill Road, South Sioux City, NE; where the employer has employees using various lubricants as part of the maintenance program without having developed and implemented a written hazard communication program that meets the requirements of this standard.  Instances of exposure include but are not limited to:           i.        In the month leading up to this inspection employees using Blue Guard 500+ Grease for maintenance of equipment.        ii.        In the month leading up to this inspection employees using Ruby Premium Diesel & Super Clear Diesel as fuel for company equipment.       iii.        In the month leading up to this inspection employees using Regular Midgrade & Premium Gasoline as fuel for company equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1050
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2016
Abate by
Mar 4, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:     The employer is failing to train employees on the use of chemicals in their workplace.  This was most recently evident during the inspection of the maintenance shed and throughout the facility located at 532 Old Sawmill Road, South Sioux City, NE; where the employer has inadequately trained employees using various lubricants as part of the maintenance program.  Instances of exposure include but are not limited to:           i.        In the month leading up to this inspection employees using Blue Guard 500+ Grease for maintenance of equipment.        ii.        In the month leading up to this inspection employees using Ruby Premium Diesel & Super Clear Diesel as fuel for company equipment.       iii.        In the month leading up to this inspection employees using Regular Midgrade & Premium Gasoline as fuel for company equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Meyer, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341067239.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.