SPRINGVILLE, NY —
OSHA Inspection: PEERLESS-WINSMITH, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PEERLESS-WINSMITH, INC. in 172 EATON STREET, SPRINGVILLE, NY 14141 (NAICS 333612). OSHA activity number 341069862.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PEERLESS-WINSMITH, INC.
- Site address
- 172 EATON STREET
- City
- SPRINGVILLE
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 14141
- Mailing
- 172 EATON STREET, SPRINGVILLE, NY 14141
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 333612
- Employees
- 89
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Nov 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $2,231 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o): a) On or about 11/19/2015 in the assembly/test area; where employees were exposed to the belt/pulley pinch point when testing new units. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2231.25
- — Z (S) $2975
1910.219 E03 I
- Issued
- Nov 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(3)(i): Vertical or inclined belt(s) were not enclosed by guard(s) conforming to the requirements specified at 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o): a) On or about 11/19/2015 in the assembly/test area; where employees were exposed to the belt/pulley pinch point when testing new units. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Nov 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $2,231 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: a) On or about 11/19/2015 in the saw department; where lockout was not used while changing saw blades on the horizontal band saws. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2231.25
- — Z (S) $2975
1910.242 B
- Issued
- Nov 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,380 · Current $1,785 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.: a) On or about 11/19/2015 in the Toshiba lathe area; where employees were exposed to flying chips and coolant from compressed air used at line pressure (80-100 psi) for cleaning at the Toshiba lathe. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1785
- — Z (S) $2380
1910.147 C05 II B
- Issued
- Nov 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(ii)(B): Lockout and tagout devices were not standardized within the facility in at least one of the following criteria: color; shape; or size: a) On or about 11/19/2015 throughout the production area; where locks similar in color, size and shape were used for employee protection under "lockout" and to render "out of service" equipment inoperative. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.147 E03 III
- Issued
- Nov 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(e)(3)(iii): The employer's energy control program did not contain specific procedures and training for when the authorized employee who applied the lockout or tagout device was not available to remove it, and the device was removed under the direction of the employer. The employer's documented procedures did not ensure that the authorized employee had knowledge that his/her lockout or tagout device had been removed prior to resuming work at that facility: a) On or about 11/19/2015 throughout the facility; where the procedures did not have a provision (procedures) to notify employees whose lock had been removed, before the employee returned to work at the facility. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Peerless-Winsmith, INC.
View Peerless-Winsmith, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 333612)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341069862.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.