OXFORD, CT —
OSHA Inspection: CONTRACT MEDICAL MANUFACTURING, LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of CONTRACT MEDICAL MANUFACTURING, LLC in 1 JACKS HILL ROAD UNIT 3E, OXFORD, CT 06478 (NAICS 339112). OSHA activity number 341070001.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CONTRACT MEDICAL MANUFACTURING, LLC
- Site address
- 1 JACKS HILL ROAD UNIT 3E
- City
- OXFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06478
- Mailing
- 1 JACKS HILL ROAD UNIT 3E, OXFORD, CT 06478
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 339112
- Employees
- 22
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.38 B
- Issued
- Jan 22, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.38(b): An emergency action plan was not in writing, kept in the workplace, and available to employees for review: Workplace: The employer did not have a written Emergency Action Plan meeting the requirements in this section.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $700
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Jan 22, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment: Workplace: The employer did not assess the workplace to determine necessitate and appropriate types of personal protective equipment (PPE) for employees.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $900
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.132 F01
- Issued
- Jan 22, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment: Workplace: The employer did not provide training and information for the employees who were required to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) while performing tasks.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Jan 22, 2016
- Abate by
- Feb 10, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: Workplace: The employer did not ensure that each affected employee was wearing appropriate eye and face protective equipment while working with and handling hazardous liquid chemicals in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $900
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jan 22, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: Workplace: The employer did not establish and implement a written hazard communication program (HazCom) where employees were required to work with and handle hazardous chemicals.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $900
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Jan 22, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: Workplace: The employer did not provide training and information for the employees who were required to work with and handle hazardous chemicals in the chemical hazards assessments.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 339112)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341070001.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.