NACOGDOCHES, TX —
OSHA Inspection: HJ INTEGRITY INVESTMENTS LLC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of HJ INTEGRITY INVESTMENTS LLC in 6967 HIGHWAY 7 EAST, NACOGDOCHES, TX 75961 (NAICS 213112). OSHA activity number 341070456.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HJ INTEGRITY INVESTMENTS LLC
- Site address
- 6967 HIGHWAY 7 EAST
- City
- NACOGDOCHES
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 75961
- Mailing
- 6967 HIGHWAY 7 EAST, NACOGDOCHES, TX 75961
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 213112
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.146 C02
- Issued
- Apr 27, 2016
- Abate by
- May 23, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(2): The employer did not inform exposed employees, by posting danger signs or by any other equally effective means, of the existence and location of and the danger posed by the permit spaces: On or about November 6, 2015, in the holding bay area employees were exposed to chemical hazards when working inside a permit required confined space without the employer informing employees of the location and danger posed by the space.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Apr 27, 2016
- Abate by
- May 23, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): On or about November 6, 2015, in the holding bay area employees were exposed to chemical hazards when working inside a permit required confined space without the employer preforming a hazard assessment of the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.146 C04
- Issued
- Apr 27, 2016
- Abate by
- May 23, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4): When the employer decided that its employees would enter permit spaces, the employer did not develop and implement a written permit space entry program that complied with 29 CFR 1910.146: On or about November 6, 2015, in the holding bay area employees were exposed to chemical hazards when working inside a permit required confined space without the employer implementing a permit confined space entry program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.146 G01
- Issued
- Apr 27, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(g)(1): The employer did not provide training so that all employees whose work was regulated by 29 CFR 1910.146 (permit required confined spaces) acquired the understanding, knowledge, and skills necessary for the safe performance of the duties assigned under 29 CFR 1910.146: On or about November 6, 2015, in the holding bay area employees were exposed to chemical hazards when working inside a permit required confined space without the employer providing training necessary for the safe performance of cleaning to tanks out.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Apr 27, 2016
- Abate by
- May 23, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program which includes the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): On or about November 6, 2015, in the holding bay area employees were exposed to chemical hazards while power washing the interior of a frack tank without the employer having a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Apr 27, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: On or about November 6, 2015, in the holding bay area employees were exposed to chemical hazards while power washing the interior of a frack tank without the employer having provided training on the hazardous chemicals in their work area.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Apr 27, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they used: On or about November 6, 2015, in the holding bay area employees were exposed to chemical hazards while power washing the interior of a frack tank without the employer having safety data sheets for each chemical.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $1600
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 213112)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341070456.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.