Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BOSTON ELECTROMETALLURGICAL CORPORATION

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of BOSTON ELECTROMETALLURGICAL CORPORATION in 6C GILL STREET, WOBURN, MA 01801 (NAICS 541712). OSHA activity number 341070498.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Boston Electrometallurgical Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Boston Electrometallurgical Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6C GILL STREET
City
WOBURN
State
MA
ZIP
01801
Mailing
6C GILL STREET, WOBURN, MA 01801
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
541712
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 15, 2016
Abate by
Feb 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $850 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:      (a) Location - 6C Gill Street, Woburn, MA:    On or about 11/20/2015, the elements of a written respiratory program necessary to ensure that the use respiratory protection did not present a health hazard were not established and implemented for employees voluntarily using powered air purifying respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $850
  • — Z (S) $1700

1910.134 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 15, 2016
Abate by
Feb 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  (a) Location - 6C Gill Street, Woburn, MA:  On or about 11/20/2015, employees voluntarily using powered air purifying respirators were not medically evaluated to determine their ability to do so.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341070498.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.