Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TEST LOGIC, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of TEST LOGIC, INC. in 17 KENNETH DOOLEY DRIVE, MIDDLETOWN, CT 06457 (NAICS 334515). OSHA activity number 341071538.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Test Logic, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Test Logic, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
TEST LOGIC, INC.
Site address
17 KENNETH DOOLEY DRIVE
City
MIDDLETOWN
State
CT
ZIP
06457
Mailing
17 KENNETH DOOLEY DRIVE, MIDDLETOWN, CT 06457
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
334515
Employees
16
Ownership type
A

15 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2015
Abate by
Feb 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(9): Cleaning. Spray booths shall be so installed that all portions are readily accessible for cleaning. A clear space of not less than 3 feet on all sides shall be kept free from storage or combustible construction.    WORKSHOP:  The western, eastern, and southern sides of the paint booth/room, unknown identification were not maintained a clear space of not less than three (3) feet at all times.      THE LEFT AND BACK SIDES WERE ABATED DURING INSPECTION
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2015
Abate by
Feb 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer shall assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE).     WORKSHOP:   The employer had not assessed the workplace to determine necessitate and appropriate types of personal protective equipment (PPE) for the employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.132 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2015
Abate by
Feb 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer shall provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment (PPE).  WORKSHOP:  The employer had not trained the employees who were required to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) on the PPE Workplace Hazard Assessment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2015
Abate by
Feb 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): In any workplace where respirators are necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators are required by the employer, the employer shall establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures. The program shall be updated as necessary to reflect those changes in workplace conditions that affect respirator use. The employer shall include in the program the following provisions of this section, as applicable:    WORKSHOP:   The employer had not established and implemented a worksite-specific written respiratory protection program and procedures consisting of employee training, proper selection, fit testing, and medical evaluations where employees were required to wear half facepiece cartridge respirators during the tasks, such as (but not limited to) spray painting.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.134 K01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2015
Abate by
Feb 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide effective training that covered the required elements in 1910.134(k)(1)(i) through 1910.134(k)(1)(vii):  WORKSHOP:  The employee, required to wear the halfface piece cartridge respirator while performing spray painting operation was not provided with respiratory protection training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2015
Abate by
Feb 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): General. The employer shall provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace. The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.    WORKSHOP:  The employee, required to wear the half facepiece cartridge respirator during the tasks, such as (but not limited to) spray painting had not been medically evaluated for the ability prior to the employee wearing the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2015
Abate by
Feb 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer shall ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator is fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter.  WORKSHOP:  The employee, required to wear the half facepiece cartridge respirators during the tasks, such as (but not limited to) spray painting had not been fit tested prior to initial wear.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2015
Abate by
Feb 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(1)(i): Respirators issued for the exclusive use of an employee shall be cleaned and disinfected as often as necessary to be maintained in a sanitary condition;    WORKSHOP: The half facepiece respirator, worn by the employees during the tasks, such as (but not limited to) spray painting was not cleaned and disinfected on the inside and outside the surfaces of the respirator.                 ABATED DURING THE INSPECTION
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.134 H02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): All respirators shall be stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals, and they shall be packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve.  WORKSHOP:  The half facepiece cartridge respirators and filtering facepiece dust masks, worn by an employee during the tasks, such as (but not limited to) spray painting were not stored properly to protect from damage and contamination.                              ABATED DURING THE INSPECTION
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer shall ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l).    WORKSHOP: The employer did not ensure through providing training and evaluation that the employees operating the powered industrial truck (PIT) were competent to operate PIT safely at all times.      ABATED DURING THE INSPECTION
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.178 A04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2015
Abate by
Feb 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4): Modifications and additions which affect capacity and safe operation shall not be performed by the customer or user without manufacturers prior written approval. Capacity, operation, and maintenance instruction plates, tags, or decals shall be changed accordingly.    WORKSHOP: The markings for the capacity rating of the front end fork attachment, that was used with the Toyota powered industrial truck (PIT) to lift and lower equipment were worn out.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.178 A05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2015
Abate by
Feb 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(5): If the truck is equipped with front-end attachments other than factory installed attachments, the user shall request that the truck be marked to identify the attachments and show the approximate weight of the truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation with load laterally centered.  WORKSHOP:  The Toyota powered industrial forklift truck, that was equipped with a non-factory installed front-end attachment was not marked to identify and show all necessary changes and information prior to use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.213 B03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.213(b)(3): On applications where injury to the operator might result if motors were to restart after power failures, provision shall be made to prevent machines from automatically restarting upon restoration of power.    WORKSHOP:  The Ryobi Precision bench top table saw was not equipped with a magnetic starter.      ABATED DURING THE INSPECTION.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2015
Abate by
Feb 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:    WORKSHOP: The employer had not established and implemented a written hazard communication program where employees were required to work with chemicals, such as (but not limited to) spray paints, welding gases, and WD 40.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2015
Abate by
Feb 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employers shall provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area. Information and training may be designed to cover categories of hazards (e.g., flammability, carcinogenicity) or specific chemicals. Chemical-specific information must always be available through labels and safety data sheets.  WORKSHOP:  The employees, who were required to work with chemicals, such as (but not limited to) spray paints, welding gases and WD 40 were not provided with information and training in the chemical hazard communications.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Test Logic, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341071538.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.