Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: EULALIA MARQUEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EULALIA MARQUEZ in 19 TELFORD ST, POOLER, GA 31322 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 341077139.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Eulalia Marquez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Eulalia Marquez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
EULALIA MARQUEZ
Site address
19 TELFORD ST
City
POOLER
State
GA
ZIP
31322
Mailing
P.O. BOX 2098, RIDGELAND, SC 29936
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 12, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,275 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):     a) At the job site, Lot 173, on or about November 10, 2015, an employee was working from the roof installing metal trim coil onto the side wall a dormer window without any means of fall protection, which exposed the employees up to 10 feet fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1275
  • — Z (S) $1700

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 12, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,275 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder:       a) At the job site, Lot 173, on or about November 10, 2015, an aluminum extension ladder did not extend 3-feet beyond the roof deck, exposing employees to a 20-feet fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1275
  • — Z (S) $1700

1926.1053 B21

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 12, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(21): Employees were not grasping the ladder with at least one hand when progressing up and/or down the ladder:   a)  At the job site, Lot 173, on or about November 10, 2015, an employee was descending a 28 foot aluminum extension ladder did not use at least one hand to grasp the ladder, exposing him up to an 20-foot fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341077139.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.