Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: A2 ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of A2 ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC in 300 ENTERPRISE DRIVE, KINGSTON, NY 12401 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 341078822.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch A2 Environmental Solutions, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for A2 Environmental Solutions, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
300 ENTERPRISE DRIVE
City
KINGSTON
State
NY
ZIP
12401
Mailing
104 HYVUE COURT, NEWBURGH, NY 12550
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238990
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2016
Abate by
Jan 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $400
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that each cited violation had been abated:  a) On or about December 23, 2016: The employer did not provide abatement certification for Citation 1, Items 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d and 2 issued on May 19, 2016.  An Abatement Demand letter was sent to the employer on December 7, 2016.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $400

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2016
Abate by
Jun 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a). On or about 11/24/15, on site, for employees required to don a North 1/2 mask respirator during asbestos remediation work. The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program to include medical evaluations, fit testing, and training.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a). On or about 11/24/15, on site, for employees required to don a North 1/2 mask respirator during asbestos remediation work. The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program to include medical evaluations.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator were not annually fit tested:   a). On or about 11/24/15, on site, for employees required to don a North 1/2 mask respirator during asbestos remediation work. The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program to include fit tests.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2016
Abate by
Jun 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary:  a). On or about 11/24/15, on site, for employees required to don a North 1/2 mask respirator during asbestos remediation work. The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program to include training.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1101 F01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2016
Abate by
Jun 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.1101(f)(1)(i): Where exposure monitoring was required under 29 CFR 1926.1101, the employer did not perform monitoring to determine accurately the airborne concentrations of asbestos to which employees were or potentially were exposed:   a). On or about 11/24/15, on site, for employees required conducting asbestos remediation work. The employer did not conduct personal air monitoring on employees.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

View A2 Environmental Solutions, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341078822.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.