Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GARCIA IMPORTED TILE & GRANITE

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of GARCIA IMPORTED TILE & GRANITE in 64 FLORAL STREET, TAUNTON, MA 02780 (NAICS 327991). OSHA activity number 341088391.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Garcia Imported Tile & Granite — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Garcia Imported Tile & Granite is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
64 FLORAL STREET
City
TAUNTON
State
MA
ZIP
02780
Mailing
64 FLORAL STREET, TAUNTON, MA 02780
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
327991
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 25, 2016
Abate by
May 26, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use:  Shop: A respirator program, including training, fit testing, and medical evaluation was not fully implemented for employees required to wear their half mask HEPA filter/organic vapor respirators during granite counter top fabrication.  On December 10, 2015 a workers was exposed over exposed to respirable silica granite counter fabrication.   SEE CITATION 1 ITEM 1b EXPOSURE INFORMATION
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2400

1910.1000 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 25, 2016
Abate by
Sep 28, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.1000(c): An employee was exposed to respirable crystalline silica in excess of the calculated 8-hour time weighted average limit of .4 mg/m3 listed in Table Z-3:  Shop: On December 10, 2015, a worker grinding and polishing granite was exposed to an 8 hour time weighted average level of 3.85 mg/m3 respirable silica dust in excess of the  0.4 mg/m3 calculated permissible exposure limit(PEL). Sampling time was 420 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for a total of 8 hours.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1000 E

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 25, 2016
Abate by
Sep 28, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1000(e): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d):   Shop: Engineering controls such as wet methods and increased local ventilation were not used to reduce silica dust below the permissible exposure limit during granite counter top fabrication.     SEE CITATION 1 ITEM 1b FOR EXPOSURE INFORMATION
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): Operators were not trained in the safe operation of powered industrial trucks as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph(1).  Shop: Workers operating the forklift had not completed a training program and evaluation where the lift was used to move stone slabs and other products.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 25, 2016
Abate by
Apr 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:   Shop: A hazard communication program has not been developed and implemented where epoxy glues and acetone were used and stone slabs were cut, sanded, and polished generating silica dust.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.141 D02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.141(d)(2)(ii): Lavatories were not provided with hot and cold, or tepid running water:  Shop: There was no hot water provided in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 A05

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 25, 2016
Abate by
Sep 28, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(5): The powered industrial truck was equipped with front-end attachments other than factory installed attachments, however the employer did not request that the truck be marked to identify the attachments and show the approximate weight of the truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation with load laterally centered:  Shop: The Caterpillar forklift used with a boom attachment to move stone slabs was not mark with required information.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341088391.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.