OSHA Inspection: ANGEL ROOFING INC

Issued

Dec 17, 2015

Penalty

Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  a. Site- Employees working from the ground were exposed to over head struck by hazards where head protection was not worn.

Issued

Dec 17, 2015

Penalty

Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  a. Site- Employees operating pneumatic nail guns were not protected from eye injuries where eye protection was not worn.

Issued

Dec 17, 2015

Abate by

Jan 14, 2016

Penalty

Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  a. Site- Employees who were exposed to a fall hazard while working from the roof were not provided with fall protection training from the employer.

Issued

Dec 17, 2015

Penalty

Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  a. Site- Employees accessing a roof from an aluminum extension ladder were not protected from a fall hazard where the ladder only extended one rung above the landing surface.

Issued

Dec 17, 2015

Penalty

Initial $14,000 · Current $14,000

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  a. Roof- Employees working from the roof were exposed to a fall of approximately 20 feet where fall protection was not utilized.