Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ALEXANDER PETROLEUM SOLUTIONS INC.

Federal Agency inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency health inspection of ALEXANDER PETROLEUM SOLUTIONS INC. in 612 CR 326 WEST, JOURDANTON, TX 78026 (NAICS 213112). OSHA activity number 341093292.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Alexander Petroleum Solutions INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Alexander Petroleum Solutions INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
612 CR 326 WEST
City
JOURDANTON
State
TX
ZIP
78026
Mailing
6461 MAVERICK TRAIL, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78240
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
213112
Employees
20
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 31, 2016
Abate by
Jun 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400

Hazardous substances X100

29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment:  IN WASH YARD:  On or about December 1, 2015, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to chemical splash hazards to the body and face, while entering trucks and tanks for cleaning operations that were contaminated with waste from oil and gas well hydraulic fracturing operations, without being trained on the use of required personal protective equipment such as, but not limited to, FR suits, safety glasses, and face shields.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2400

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 31, 2016
Abate by
Jun 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000

Hazardous substances X100

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  IN WASH YARD:  On or about December 1, 2015, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to potential oxygen deficient atmospheres and/or inhalation of toxic gases or vapors, when required to wear tight-fitting 3M 6000 half-facepiece respirators with Organic Vapor/Acid Gas/P100 cartridges without the protections afforded by a respiratory protection program.  Employees routinely entered trucks and tanks for cleaning operations that were contaminated with waste from oil and gas well hydraulic fracturing operations.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.146 C04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 31, 2016
Abate by
Jun 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000

Hazardous substances X100

29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4): When the employer decided that its employees would enter permit spaces, the employer did not develop and implement a written permit space entry program that complied with 29 CFR 1910.146:  IN WASH YARD:  On or about December 1, 2015, and in times prior thereto, employees were exposed to chemical splash hazards, without being trained on how to use and maintain personal protective equipment, when performing cleaning operations for trucks and tanks that were contaminated with waste from oil and gas well hydraulic fracturing operations.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.151 B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 31, 2016
Abate by
Jun 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
29 CFR 1910.151(b): There was neither an infirmary, clinic, or hospital used for the treatment of all injured employees in near proximity to the workplace nor a person or persons adequately trained to render first aid:  IN WASH YARD: On or about December 1, 2015 employees were exposed potential oxygen deficient atmospheres and/or inhalation of toxic gases or vapors, while entering permit required confined spaces without being trained to render first aid when there was no hospital close to the site prior to allowing employees entry.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $7000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341093292.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.