Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HECTOR BENITEZ

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HECTOR BENITEZ in 6550 EMERALD ST, BOISE, ID 83704 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341093805.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Hector Benitez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hector Benitez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
HECTOR BENITEZ
Site address
6550 EMERALD ST
City
BOISE
State
ID
ZIP
83704
Mailing
5015 E USTICK RD #19, CALDWELL, ID 83605
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 22, 2016
Abate by
Jan 28, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $680 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system:   a) Commercial jobsite:  On November 23, 2015 and at times prior thereto; employees performing re-roofing activities were not protected by the fall protection system that was in place.    b) Commercial jobsite:  On November 23, 2015 and at times prior thereto; employees performing re-roofing activities were not wearing their personal fall arrest systems.   Note) Abatement certification IS required for this item.   Note) When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.  There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems.  Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $680
  • — Z (S) $1360

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341093805.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.