Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: B & W HOME IMPROVEMENT, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of B & W HOME IMPROVEMENT, LLC in 64-66 DICKERMAN STREET, NEW HAVEN, CT 06511 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341101004.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch B & W Home Improvement, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for B & W Home Improvement, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
64-66 DICKERMAN STREET
City
NEW HAVEN
State
CT
ZIP
06511
Mailing
155 GILBERT AVENUE, NEW HAVEN, CT 06511
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 5 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 26, 2016
Abate by
May 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $400
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  Location: 64-66 Dickerman Street, New Haven, CT 06511  Certification and documentation for Citation 01, Item 001a, was not received within 10 calendar days (by February 26, 2016) after the final abatement date (February 16, 2016) and Citation 01, Item 1b, was not received within 10 calendar days (by March 11, 2016) after the final abatement date (March 1, 2016), and Citation 01, Item 002 was not received within 10 calendar days (by February 26, 2016) after the final abatement date (February 16, 2016), and Citation 01, Item 003 was not received within 10 calendar days (by February 26, 2016) after the final abatement date (February 16, 2016), and Citation 01, Item 004b was not received within 10 calendar days (by March 11, 2016) after the final abatement date (March 1, 2016).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $400

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2016
Abate by
Feb 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  JOBSITE:  1) The employees performing roofing work on a steep sloped (8 in 12 pitch) roof and exposed to the hazard of falling, between 24 ft. 1 inch to 35 ft. 5 inches to the ground were not protected by guardrails, personal fall arrest systems or other equivalent means.  2) Employees were exposed to the hazard of falling 14 ft. to the ground while performing cleaning inside the house where there were unguarded wall openings at the 2nd level.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2016
Abate by
Mar 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  JOBSITE:  The employees performing roofing and cleaning of a residential house and exposed to the hazard of falling to the ground, were not provided with training for fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2016
Abate by
Feb 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  JOBSITE:  The two extension ladders that employees used to gain access to the roof did not have their side rails extended 3 ft. above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2016
Abate by
Feb 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed:  JOBSITE:  The 8 ft. step ladder used by employees to access areas of the roof of a residential house was not set in the open position as designed.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladders were not used at an angle such than the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder way approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support):  JOBSITE:  The extension ladders used to gain access to the roof of the residential house, were used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the feet of the ladder was greater than one-quarter the working length of the ladders (the distance along the ladders between their feet and top supports).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2016
Abate by
Mar 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize hazards related to ladders and stairways:  JOBSITE:  The employees using a step ladder and extension ladders access to the roof of the residential house, were not trained in the proper means to erect the ladders, recognize hazards and the procedures to minimize any hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View B & W Home Improvement, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341101004.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.