Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ATHENA MANUFACTURING, LP

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of ATHENA MANUFACTURING, LP in 15900 BRATTON LN., AUSTIN, TX 78728 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 341105815.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Athena Manufacturing, LP — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Athena Manufacturing, LP is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
15900 BRATTON LN.
City
AUSTIN
State
TX
ZIP
78728
Mailing
15900 BRATTON LN., AUSTIN, TX 78728
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332710
Employees
107
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2016
Abate by
Mar 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,700 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): A representative monitoring program was not developed and implemented when information indicated that an employee's exposure may equal or exceed an 8 hour time weighted average of 85dBA.  On or about 9 December 2015, the employer did not develop and implement a noise monitoring program where employees performing spraying and blasting operations would equal or exceed an 8 hour time weighted average of 85dBA, exposing employees to the hazard of excessive noise.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2700
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2016
Abate by
Mar 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,700 · Current $1,620 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures in any workplace where respirators were necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators were required by the employer:  On or about 9 December 2015, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that each of the following provisions were established and implemented in the respiratory protection program where employees are required to wear respirators:  1910.134(c)(1)(i)-Procedures for selecting respirators for use in the workplace;  1910.134(c)(1)(ii)-Medical evaluations of employees required to use respirators;  1910.134(c)(1)(iii)-Fit testing procedures for tight-fitting respirators;  1910.134(c)(1)(iv)-Procedures for proper use of respirators in routine and reasonably foreseeable emergency situations;  1910.134(c)(1)(v)-Procedures and schedules for cleaning, disinfecting, storing, inspecting, repairing, discarding and otherwise maintaining respirators;  1910.134(c)(1)(vi)-Procedures to ensure adequate air quality, quantity, and flow of breathing air for atmosphere-supplying respirators; 1910.134(c)(1)(vii)-Training of employees in the respiratory hazards to which they are potentially exposed during routine and emergency situations;  1910.134(c)(1)(viii)-Training of employees in the proper use of respirators, including putting on and removing the, any limitations on their use, and their maintenance; and 1910.134(c)(1)(xi)-Procedures for regularly evaluating the effectiveness of the program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1620
  • — Z (S) $2700

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2016
Abate by
Mar 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace.  On or about 9 December 2015, the employer did not provide medical evaluations to employees that are required to use respirators which include the 3M N95 particulate respirators and the 3M half face respirators when conducting painting activities.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2016
Abate by
Mar 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece was used, and at least annually thereafter.   On or about 9 December 2015, the employer did not provide fit testing for employees that are required to use respirators that include the 3M N95 particulate respirators and the 3M half face respirators when conducting painting activities.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Athena Manufacturing, LP's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341105815.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.