Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: 360 FIRE PREVENTION, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of 360 FIRE PREVENTION, LLC in 106 NORTH GROVE ST., EAST ORANGE, NJ 07017 (NAICS 238220). OSHA activity number 341106789.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch 360 Fire Prevention, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for 360 Fire Prevention, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
106 NORTH GROVE ST.
City
EAST ORANGE
State
NJ
ZIP
07017
Mailing
40 EDISON AVE., OAKLAND, NJ 07436
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238220
Employees
22
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 K06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 27, 2016
Abate by
Jun 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6) as referenced by 29 CFR 1926.103: The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer:    a)  106 N. Grove St.  East Orange, NJ    The employees were not given the basic information on respirator usage, maintenance, storage, and the respirator's physiological effects when worn.  Employees voluntary use 3M 8210 N95 respirators while installing plumbing during a renovation of an 84 unit apartment building.    Condition observed on or about  11/24/2015
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 27, 2016
Abate by
Jun 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)as referenced by 29 CFR 1926.59: The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:     a)  106 N. Grove St. East Orange, NJ    The employer did not develop and maintain a written hazard communication program for employees who are exposed to chemicals, including but not limited to, Harvey C-4 CPVC Cement, Leak Lock Blue and Super Dope Pipe thread sealant.    Condition observed on or about 11/24/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.62 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 27, 2016
Abate by
Jun 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(l)(1)(i): The employer did not include lead in the program established to comply with the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) 29 CFR 1910.1200, did not ensure that each employee has access to labels on containers of lead and safety data sheets, and did not ensure each employee had training in accordance with the provisions of HCS and paragraph (l) of this section:    a) 106 N. Grove St., East Orange, NJ    The employer did not include lead in the hazard communication program and ensure that each employee had access to labels, safety data sheets, and training in the hazards of lead.  Employees performing plumbing work were exposed to damaged and flaking paint throughout the building containing between 0.17% and 0.40 % lead.      Condition observed on or about 11/24/2015.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1101 K01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 27, 2016
Abate by
Jun 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(1)(ii): The employer did not include asbestos in the program established to comply with the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) 29 CFR 1910.1200, did not ensure that each employee had access to labels on containers of asbestos and safety data sheets and did not ensure hazard communication training on asbestos in accordance with the provisions of the Hazard Communication Standard 29 CFR 1910.1200 as well as paragraphs (k)(9) and (10) of this section:    a) 106 N. Grove St., East Orange, NJ    The employer did not include asbestos in the hazard communication program to include ensuring that workers had access to labels, safety data sheets and were trained in the hazards of asbestos.  Employees performing plumbing work were exposed to thermal systems insulation (TSI) containing up to 40% Chrysotile asbestos, floor tile containing up to 13% Chrysotile asbestos and wall plaster containing 2% Chrysotile asbestos.    Condition observed on or about 11/24/2015.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1101 K03 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 27, 2016
Abate by
Jun 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(3)(i): Before the employer permitted its own employees to perform work subject to this standard in areas containing asbestos-containing material (ACM) and presumed asbestos-containing material (PACM), the employer did not identify the presence, location and quantity of asbestos containing material and/or presumed asbestos containing material therein pursuant to 29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(1):    a) 106 N. Grove St., East Orange, NJ    The employer did not identify the presence, location and quantity of asbestos for employees installing new plumbing during the renovation of a 82 unit apartment building.  Employees were exposed to thermal systems insulation containing up to 40% Chrysotile asbestos, floor tile containing up to 13% Chrysotile asbestos and wall plaster containing 2% Chrysotile asbestos.    Condition observed on or about 11/24/2015.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1101 K03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 27, 2016
Abate by
Jun 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(3)(ii): Before work under this standard is performed employers of employees who will perform such work shall inform the following persons of the location and quantity of ACM and/or PACM present in the area and the precautions to be taken to insure that airborne asbestos is confined to the area.    a) 106 N. Grove St., East Orange, NJ    The employer failed to notify employees of the presence of asbestos in the thermal system insulation (TSI) located on the boilers in the basement and failed to inform them of precautions to take to minimize airborne release of asbestos while installing new plumbing where ACM and/or PACM may be present.  Employees were exposed to thermal systems insulation containing up to 40% Chrysotile asbestos, floor tile containing up to 13% Chrysotile asbestos and wall plaster containing 2% Chrysotile asbestos.    Condition observed on or about 11/24/2015.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341106789.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.