Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AGRA ENVIRONMENTAL & LABORATORY SERVICES

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of AGRA ENVIRONMENTAL & LABORATORY SERVICES in 1182 ROUTE 23, SUSSEX, NJ 07461 (NAICS 221310). OSHA activity number 341110989.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Agra Environmental & Laboratory Services — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Agra Environmental & Laboratory Services is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1182 ROUTE 23
City
SUSSEX
State
NJ
ZIP
07461
Mailing
90 1/2 WEST BLACKWELL ST, DOVER, NJ 07801
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
221310
Employees
20
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.146 C04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 18, 2016
Abate by
Jul 29, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4): When the employer decided that its employees would enter permit spaces, the employer did not develop and implement a written permit space entry program that complied with 29 CFR 1910.146:      a)  Workplace, 1182 Route 23, Sussex, NJ    The employer requires employees to enter a permit required confined space, specifically the subterranean Backwash Basin #1, to wash out the basin with a standard garden hose.  However, the employer did not develop and implement a written permit space entry program.        Violation determined 12-10-15
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 18, 2016
Abate by
Jul 29, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    a) Workplace, 1182 Route 23, Sussex, NJ    The employer did not implement a written hazard communication program for employees exposed to hazardous chemicals to include but not limited to Sodium Hypochlorite, Polyaluminum Chloride and Amrex 20% Sodium Permanganate Solution.       Violation determined on or about 12-10-15
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.1200 H03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 18, 2016
Abate by
Jul 29, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii): Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area:    a) Workplace, 1182 Route 23, Sussex, NJ    The employer did not train employees on the hazards of chemicals including but not limited to Sodium Hypochlorite (corrosive), Polyaluminum Chloride (incompatible with Sodium Hypochlorite) and Amrex 20% Sodium Permanganate Solution (strong oxidizer).  Employees were not provided specific information and training regarding incompatibilities between chemicals, hazards of associated reactions or hazardous properties of oxidizers.      Violation determined on or about 12-10-15
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 18, 2016
Abate by
Jul 29, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iii): Employee training did not include the measures employees can take to protect themselves from chemical hazards, including specific procedures the employer had implemented to protect employees from exposure to hazardous chemicals, such as appropriate work practices, emergency procedures and personal protective equipment to be used:    a) Workplace, 1182 Route 23, Sussex, NJ    The employer did not train workers on the measures employees can take to protect themselves from chemical hazards, to include work practices, emergency procedures and personal protective equipment to be used in the case of spills or leaks.  Employees were exposed to chlorine vapors and required medical treatment after responding to an above ground tank containment leak of Sodium Hypochlorite that mixed with PACL -108 polyaluminum chloride.        Violation determined on or about 12-10-15
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341110989.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.