Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of WESTERN GAS PARTNERS, LP in 231 COUNTY ROAD 452, ORLA, TX 79770 (NAICS 213112). OSHA activity number 341113496.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Western GAS Partners, LP — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Western GAS Partners, LP is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
231 COUNTY ROAD 452
City
ORLA
State
TX
ZIP
79770
Mailing
231 COUNTY ROAD 452, ORLA, TX 79770
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
213112
Employees
200
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.119 D03 I C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 2, 2016
Abate by
Jun 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(C): Information pertaining to the equipment in the process did not include the electrical classification:    HARP Unit: On or about December 3, 2015 the employer did not provide the electrical classification map to operators. This condition exposed employees to an explosion hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $3500
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.119 E03 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 2, 2016
Abate by
May 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(iii): The process hazard analysis did not address engineering and administrative controls applicable to the hazards and their interrelationships such as appropriate application of detection methodologies to provide early warning of releases.  HARP UNIT: On or about December 3, 2015 the  HARP Unit process hazard analysis did not address engineering and administrative controls applicable to the hazards and their interrelationships such as appropriate application of detection methodologies to provide early warning of releases. This condition exposed employees to an explosion hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.119 E03 IV

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 2, 2016
Abate by
May 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(iv): The process hazard analysis did not address the consequences of failure of engineering and administrative controls:  HARP Unit: On or about December 3, 2015 the HARP Unit PHA did not address the consequences of failure of engineering and administrative controls. This condition exposed employees to an explosion hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.119 F01 II B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 2, 2016
Abate by
Jun 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii)(B): The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for steps required to correct or avoid deviation from the operating limits in the covered process.    HARP Unit: On or about December 3, 2015 the employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provided clear instructions for steps required to correct and avoid deviation from the operating limits in the covered process.  This condition exposed employees to an explosion hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.119 K01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 2, 2016
Abate by
May 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
29 CFR 1910.119(k)(1): The empoyer did not issue a hot work permit for hot work operations conducted on or near a covered process:  HARP Unit: On or about December 3, 2015 the employer did not issue a hot work permit for a heated pressure washer in the covered process. This condition exposed employees to an explosion hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

View Western GAS Partners, LP's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341113496.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.