Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FIBER & PALLET RECYCLING, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of FIBER & PALLET RECYCLING, INC. in 200 9TH ST., GREEN BAY, WI 54304 (NAICS 423930). OSHA activity number 341119170.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Fiber & Pallet Recycling, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Fiber & Pallet Recycling, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
200 9TH ST.
City
GREEN BAY
State
WI
ZIP
54304
Mailing
N2076 MALONEY RD, KAUKAUNA, WI 54130
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423930
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:  (a)  The employer failed to develop and document a Hazardous Energy Control Program to include energy control procedures when employees were performing servicing and maintenance activities.  (b)  The employer failed to develop and document a Hazardous Energy Control Program to include employee training when employees were performing servicing and maintenance activities.  (c)  The employer failed to develop and document a Hazardous Energy Control Program to include periodic inspections when employees were performing servicing and maintenance activities.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.176 B

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 27, 2016
Abate by
Feb 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.176(b): Material stored in tiers was not stacked, blocked, interlocked or limited in height so that it was stable and secure against sliding and collapse:  (a)  Pallets with material were not stacked in a way that it was stable and secure exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 27, 2016
Abate by
Mar 17, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:  (a)  The employer failed to evaluate the forklift operators at least once every three years by first observing the powered industrial truck operator during normal operations to determine if the operator was performing safely, and second by asking pertinent questions to ensure that the operator has the knowledge or experience needed to operate the truck safely.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 27, 2016
Abate by
Feb 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been  taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s):  (a)  The Toyota #2 (Model:  42-5FGCU25) was not taken out of service when it did not have a functioning horn exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $840
  • — Z (S) $1200

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341119170.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.