Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: VERNON COLLISION CENTER, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of VERNON COLLISION CENTER, INC. in 244R BROAD ST,, MANCHESTER, CT 06040 (NAICS 811111). OSHA activity number 341119212.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Vernon Collision Center, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Vernon Collision Center, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
244R BROAD ST,
City
MANCHESTER
State
CT
ZIP
06040
Mailing
244R BROAD ST,, MANCHESTER, CT 06040
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811111
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 2016
Abate by
May 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1460

29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:  BAY AREA  On, or about, December 14, 2015, the employer did not ensure that each employee used appropriate eye protection; such as, but not limited to safety goggles, when working with Key Extreme Wheel Cleaner that contained up to 10% ammonium bifluoride, which may cause internal, chemical burns.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.151 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 2016
Abate by
May 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1460

29 CFR 1910.151(b): First aid supplies approved by a consulting physician were not readily available:   BAY AREA  On, or about, December 14, 2015, the employer failed to provide an approved antidote for hydrofluoric acid skin absorption, such as, but not limited to calcium gluconate, when employees worked with Key Extreme Wheel Cleaner, a corrosive cleaner that contained up to 10% ammonium bifluoride.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.1048 I03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 2016
Abate by
May 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1290

29 CFR 1910.1048(i)(3): When there was a possibility that an employee's eyes could be splashed with solutions containing 0.1 percent or greater formaldehyde, the employer did not provide acceptable eyewash facilities within the immediate work area for emergency use:  BAY AREA  On, or about, December 14, 2015, the employer failed to provide eyewash facilities within the immediate work area for employees that worked with automotive coatings such as, but not limited to, PERMACRON-MISCHLACK SERIE 293, which contained 0.1% formaldehyde.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.1200 F06 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 2016
Abate by
May 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical:   BAY NUMBER 2  On, or about, December 14, 2015, a container of Key Extreme Wheel Cleaner that contained ammonium bifluoride, was not labeled, tagged or marked with the words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, that provided general information regarding the hazards of the chemical, such as, but not limited to, internal corrosivity.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 2016
Abate by
May 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  BAY NUMBER 2  On, or about, December 14, 2015, employees that worked with Key Extreme Wheel Cleaner, which contained ammonium bifluoride, had not been trained on the health hazards of the chemical. Ammonium bifluoride may be absorbed through the skin and cause internal, chemical burns.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341119212.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.