Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BADGER ASBESTOS AND MOLD ABATEMENT, INC.

Programmed Related inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a programmed Related health inspection of BADGER ASBESTOS AND MOLD ABATEMENT, INC. in 2935 WEST SILVER SPRING DRIVE, MILWAUKEE, WI 53209 (NAICS 562910). OSHA activity number 341120129.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Badger Asbestos and Mold Abatement, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Badger Asbestos and Mold Abatement, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2935 WEST SILVER SPRING DRIVE
City
MILWAUKEE
State
WI
ZIP
53209
Mailing
P.O. BOX 211033, MILWAUKEE, WI 53221
Inspection type
Programmed Related (J)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
562910
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.1101 E02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 43 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2016
Abate by
Feb 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(e)(2): Signs were not provided and displayed in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(7):    (a)     On or about December 2, 2015, Class I work such as the removal of asbestos thermal system insulation from the pipes in the warehouse and Class III work such as the encapsulation of the asbestos thermal system insulation of pipes in the warehouse was done and there were no signs posted to demarcate the regulated area in order to minimize the number of warehouse workers in the area and to protect warehouse workers outside the area from asbestos.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1101 F02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 43 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2016
Abate by
Feb 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(f)(2)(i): The employer with a work operation covered by the asbestos standard did not ensure that a "competent person" conducted an exposure assessment immediately before or at the initiation of the operation to ascertain expected exposures during that operation or workplace:    (a)     On or about December 2, 2015, Class I work such as the removal of asbestos thermal system insulation from the pipes in the warehouse and Class III work such as the encapsulation of the asbestos thermal system insulation of pipes in the warehouse was done and there had been no determination of employee exposure made from breathing zone air samples that were representative of the 8-hour time weighted average and 30-minute short term exposures of each employee.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1101 H03 IV A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2016
Abate by
Feb 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(h)(3)(iv)(A): The employer did not provide employees with a tight-fitting powered air-purifying respirator operated in the pressure-demand mode and equipped with either HEPA egress cartridges or an auxiliary positive-pressure self-contained breathing apparatus, whenever the employees were in regulated area performing Class I asbestos work for which a negative exposure assessment was not available and the exposure assessment indicated that the exposure level will be at or below 1 fiber per cubic centimeter as an 8-hour time weighted average:    (a)     On or about December 2, 2015, Class I work such as the removal of asbestos thermal system insulation from the pipes in the warehouse and Class III work such as the encapsulation of the asbestos thermal system insulation of pipes in the warehouse was done and the asbestos workers used non-powered, negative pressure air-purifying half-face respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1101 J01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 43 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2016
Abate by
Feb 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(j)(1)(i): The employer did not establish a decontamination area, consisting of an equipment room, shower area, and clean room in series, adjacent and connected to the regulated area:  Note:  This requirement applies to Class I operations involving over 25 linear or 10 square feet of thermal system insulation or surfacing containing asbestos-containing material or presumed asbestos-containing material.    (a)     On or about December 2, 2015, Class I work such as the removal of approximately 200 linear feet of asbestos thermal system insulation from the pipes in the warehouse was done and there had been no three stage decontamination area established.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1101 M01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2016
Abate by
Feb 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(m)(1)(i)(A): The employer did not institute a medical surveillance program for all employees who for a combined total of 30 or more days per year were engaged in Class I, II and III work or were exposed at or above a permissible exposure limit:  Note:  Any day in which a worker engaged in Class II or Class III operations or a combination thereof on intact material for one hour or less (taking into account the entire time spent on the removal operation, including cleanup) and, while doing so, adheres fully to the work practices specified in this standard, shall not be counted:      (a)     On or about December 2, 2015, Class I work such as the removal of asbestos thermal system insulation from the pipes in the warehouse and Class III work such as the encapsulation of the asbestos thermal system insulation of pipes in the warehouse was done and there was no medical surveillance program implemented that included medical examinations, physician consultations, providing information to the physician, and obtaining the physicians written opinion.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341120129.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.