Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HAWLEY CONSTRUCTION CORP.

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of HAWLEY CONSTRUCTION CORP. in 63 CEDAR DRIVE, DANBURY, CT 06811 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 341122638.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Hawley Construction Corp. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hawley Construction Corp. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
63 CEDAR DRIVE
City
DANBURY
State
CT
ZIP
06811
Mailing
30 GERMANTOWN ROAD, DANBURY, CT 06810
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236115
Employees
1
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Other-than-serious 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
May 25, 2016
Abate by
Jun 3, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain a safety program which provides for frequent and regular inspections of jobsites, materials, and equipment to be made by a competent person (i.e., a person who is capable of identifying exist).    WORKSITE: The employer did not perform frequent and regular inspections and assessments of the worksite, materials and equipment by not only initiating, but also maintaining safety programs where employees were required to hoist bundles of rebar using slings hooked onto teeth of the bucket of, and transport the bundles of rebar with an excavator to different location where the road conditions were uneven and up/down slopped surfaces.     On or about December 8th, 2015, one of employees was trying to hand-grab the above bundles of rebar (loads) by jumping up and down from underneath the elevated loads that were rigged with slings hooked onto teeth of the bucket of the Kobelco Model SK160LC hydraulic excavator. The slings came off the teeth of the bucket, causing the loads to fall, strike and pin the employee to the ground. The employee sustained fatal head injuries from the incident.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $2000
  • — Z (S) $3080

1926.20 B03

Other-than-serious 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
May 25, 2016
Abate by
Jun 3, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(3): Machinery, tool(s), material(s), or equipment which was not in compliance with the applicable requirement(s) of 29 CFR 1926 was not prohibited, and/or was not either identified as unsafe by tagging, or locking the controls to render them inoperable, or physically removed from its place of operation.     WORKSITE: The two (2) synthetic web slings, used by employees to lift and carry bundles of rebar using the bucket of the Kobelco Model SK160LC excavator were not in compliance with 29 CFR 1926.251, and the sling were neither tagged nor removed from the service.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.251 A06

Other-than-serious 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
May 25, 2016
Abate by
Jun 3, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.251(a)(6): Each day before being used, and during use, where service conditions warrant, the sling and all fastenings and attachments were not inspected for damage or defects by a competent person, and damaged or defective slings were not immediately removed from service:    WORKSITE: The two (2) Synthetic web slings, used by employees to lift loads with the Kobelco model SK160LC hydraulic excavator were not inspected by a competent person for excessive wear and/or damage prior to use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.251 E01 II

Other-than-serious 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
May 25, 2016
Abate by
Jun 3, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.251(e)(1)(ii): Synthetic web sling(s) were not marked or coded to show rated capacities for each type of hitch:    WORKSITE: The two (2) Synthetic web slings, used by employees to lift loads with the Kobelco model SK160LC hydraulic excavator were not marked with data plates to show and identify the rated capacities of the slings.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.251 E01 I

Other-than-serious 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
May 25, 2016
Abate by
Jun 3, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.251(e)(1)(i): Synthetic web sling(s) were not marked or coded to show the name and trademark of the manufacturer:    WORKSITE: The two (2) Synthetic web slings, used by employees to lift loads with the Kobelco model SK160LC hydraulic excavator were not marked with data plates to show and identify name of the manufacturer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.251 E01 III

Other-than-serious 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
May 25, 2016
Abate by
Jun 3, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.251(e)(1)(iii): Synthetic web sling(s) were not marked or coded to show type of material:    WORKSITE: The two (2) Synthetic web slings, used by employees to lift loads with the Kobelco model SK160LC hydraulic excavator were not marked with data plates to show and identify the type of material.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.251 E08 IV

Other-than-serious 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
May 25, 2016
Abate by
Jun 3, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.251(e)(8)(iv): Synthetic web slings with broken or worn stitches were not immediately removed from service.    WORKSITE: The two (2) Synthetic web slings, used by employees to lift loads with the Kobelco model SK160LC hydraulic excavator had numerous areas of worn and damaged stitching, and the slings were not removed from service.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
May 25, 2016
Abate by
Jun 3, 2016
Penalty
Initial $6,160 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:    WORKSITE: The employees, exposed to head injuries from impact and/or falling objects while helping and performing "rebar transporting" tasks with an excavator were not wearing any head protection.     Hawley Construction Corporation was previously cited for a violation of this Occupational Safety and Health standard (29 CFR1926.100(a)), which was contained in OSHA Inspection Number 314962853, Citation Number 1, Item Number 1, affirmed as a final order on 6/20//2011, with respect to a workplace located at 151 Brookdale Road Stamford, CT.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (R) $6160

View Hawley Construction Corp.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341122638.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.