Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: INNOVATIVE CONCEPTS IN ENTERTAINMENT, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of INNOVATIVE CONCEPTS IN ENTERTAINMENT, INC. in 10123 MAIN STREET, CLARENCE, NY 14031 (NAICS 339932). OSHA activity number 341134344.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Innovative Concepts in Entertainment, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Innovative Concepts in Entertainment, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
10123 MAIN STREET
City
CLARENCE
State
NY
ZIP
14031
Mailing
10123 MAIN STREET, CLARENCE, NY 14031
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
339932
Employees
200
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 18, 2016
Abate by
Jun 18, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:    a) Plant - On or about 12/15/2015 - Employees are voluntarily wear 3M 7503 elastomeric respiratory with P95 particulate filters while working.  The employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program.       ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $3600

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 18, 2016
Abate by
Jun 18, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a) Plant - On or about 12/15/2015, employees are voluntarily wear 3M 7503 elastomeric respiratory with P95 particulate filters while working.  The employee was not provided with a medical evaluation prior to using the respirator.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 18, 2016
Abate by
Jun 18, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not ensure that each employee can demonstrate knowledge of at least the basic information on respirators, including Appendix D of this section to employees who wear respirators when not required by this section or by the employer to do so:  a) Plant - On or about 12/15/2015, the employer did not ensure that each employee can demonstrate knowledge of at least the basic information on respirators, including Appendix D of this section to employees voluntarily wear 3M 7503 elastomeric respiratory with P95 particulate filters while working .     ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
May 18, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.:    a) Plant - On or about 12/15/2015, an employee was using an air nozzle to clean up and clear dust off equipment and floors.  The air pressure was 60 - 65 p.s.i.    b) Plant - On or about 12/15/2015, an employee was using an air nozzle to clean up and clear dust off equipment and floors.  The air pressure was 90 p.s.i.    c) Plant - On or about 12/15/2015, an employee was using an air nozzle to clean up and clear dust off equipment and floors.  The air pressure was 100 p.s.i.    NO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $3600

1910.1048 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 18, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1048(d)(1): The employer with a workplace or work operation covered by this standard did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure for each employee exposed to formaldehyde:    a) Plant - On or about 01/07/2016 and ongoing, employees were cutting Norbord MDF.  The employer did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure for each employee exposed to formaldehyde.      NO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $4500

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341134344.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.