Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HERBERT GERMANY

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HERBERT GERMANY in 1480 INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY, AKRON, OH 44310 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 341139590.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Herbert Germany — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Herbert Germany is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
HERBERT GERMANY
Site address
1480 INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY
City
AKRON
State
OH
ZIP
44310
Mailing
1480 INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY, AKRON, OH 44310
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332999
Employees
300
Ownership type
A

14 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2016
Abate by
Jun 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,940 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    On or about December 22, 2015, the employer failed to ensure that equipment maintained and serviced by employees had machine specific procedures developed for the control of hazardous energies.  Energy sources included, but are not limited to, electrical, pneumatic, hydraulic, etc. Employees are tasked with maintaining, servicing, and operating equipment including but not limited to the vertical boring mill lathes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2940
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.147 C05 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2016
Abate by
Apr 29, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,940 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(i): Locks, tags, chains, wedges, key blocks, adapter pins, self-locking fasteners, or other hardware were not provided by the employer for isolating, securing or blocking of machines or equipment from energy sources:  On or about December 22, 2015, the employer failed to provide protective materials and hardware to be used for isolating, securing or blocking machines and equipment from all energy sources prior to work being performed on them.  Energy sources included, but are not limited to, electrical, pneumatic, hydraulic, etc. Employees are tasked with maintaining, servicing, and operating equipment including but not limited to the vertical boring mill lathes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2940
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2016
Abate by
Jun 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,940 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:    On or about December 22, 2015, the employer failed to conduct periodic inspection of their energy control procedures on at least an annual basis to ensure it was updated and effective.  Employees are tasked with maintaining, servicing, and operating equipment including but not limited to the vertical boring mill lathes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2940
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2016
Abate by
Apr 29, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,940 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees:  On or about December 22, 2015, the employer failed to ensure that employees were trained on the control of hazardous energies. Employees tasked with the LO/TO of equipment for maintaining and servicing had not received authorized training. Employees tasked with operating and working near equipment had not received affected training. Energy sources included, but are not limited to, electrical, pneumatic, hydraulic, etc. Employees are tasked with maintaining, servicing, and operating equipment including but not limited to the vertical lathes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2940
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.157 G02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 59 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2016
Abate by
Jun 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2): The educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting was not provided to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually thereafter:  Note:  Applies where all employees are expected to fight fires.    On or about December 22, 2015, the employer failed to provide training to employees who work in the warehouse on fire extinguisher use for incipient stage fires on an annual basis.    a)  Note the employer may exercise one of the following options:     1. Provide portable fire extinguishers as specified in 29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1), meet the distribution requirements per 29 CFR 1910.157(d) (75 to the nearest extinguisher for Class A fires and 50 to the nearest unit for Class B fires), and provide training and education for all employees in the use of such equipment and the hazards associated with incipient stage fire fighting as specified in 29 CFR 1910.157(g).  The other sections of 29 CFR also apply.     2. Provide extinguishers as specified in 29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1), designate certain employees to be the only employees authorized to use such equipment and require all other employees to immediately evacuate upon the sound of the fire alarm, establish this in writing in an emergency action plan as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.38(a) and train/educate designated employees per 1910.157(g).  Utilizing this option exempts the employer from distribution requirements of 29 CFR 1910.157(d).     3. Establish a written fire safety policy which requires the immediate and total evacuation of employees from the workplace upon the sounding of a fire alarm signal.  This policy shall include an emergency action plan and a fire prevention plan as specified in 29 CFR 1910.38(a) and 29 CFR 1910.39(a).  Utilizing this option exempts the employer from the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.157 to include the need for providing portable fire equipment unless a specific standard requires that a portable fire extinguisher be provided (such as those requirements in 29 CFR 1910.106/107 related to the use/storage of flammable/combustible liquids).  If extinguishers are provided, but not intended for employee use, 29 CFR 1910.157(e) and (f) are still applicable (inspection, maintenance, and testing of equipment).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1260
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.179 J02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2016
Abate by
Jun 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,520 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2)(I):  Frequent inspections of all functioning operating mechanisms were not being conducted for maladjustment interfering with proper operation.      On or about December 22, 2015, the employer failed to ensure that frequent inspections were being performed on the overhead cranes in the main facility and weld shop.  Overhead cranes are used daily by employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2520
  • — Z (S) $4200

1910.179 J02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2016
Abate by
Jun 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2)(ii): Frequent crane inspections were not being performed to determine if there was any deterioration or hydraulic leakage in the lines.    On or about December 22, 2015, the employer failed to ensure that frequent inspections were being performed on the overhead cranes in the main facility and weld shop.  Overhead cranes are used daily by employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.179 J02 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2016
Abate by
Jun 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2)(iv): Monthly inspections of hoist chains, with a certification record which includes the date of inspection, the signature of the person who performed the inspection and an identifier of the chain which was inspected, were not performed:      On or about December 22, 2015, the employer failed to ensure that frequent inspections were being performed on the hoist chains being used with the overhead cranes in the main facility and the weld shop.  Overhead cranes are used daily by employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2016
Abate by
Apr 29, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  On or about December 22, 2015, the employer failed to ensure that effective guarding was in place on the 72 inch boring mill lathe (vertical, Webster Bennett Mimik), to protect employees from the hazard of flying chips or sparks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.213 I01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2016
Abate by
Apr 29, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.213(i)(1): Nonworking portion(s) of the blade of bandsaw(s) were not enclosed or guarded:  On or about December 22, 2015, the employer failed to provide effective guarding on the non working portions (10 inches per each side of the used portion of the blade) of the Wells Horizontal Band Saw  which was being used to cut wood pieces.   The band saw is located directly behind the 72 inch vertical boring mill lathe in the main facility work area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.219 D01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2016
Abate by
May 5, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,940 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):  On or about December 22, 2015, the employer failed to provide effective guarding on the pulley portion of the mechanical power transmission that was connected to the 72 inch vertical boring mill lathe (Webster Bennett Mimik) located in the main facility work area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2940
  • — Z (S) $4900

1904.4 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2016
Abate by
Apr 29, 2016
Penalty
Initial $700 · Current $420 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.4(a): The employer did not keep records of fatalities, injuries and illnesses as required by this part.  The employer did not keep records -OSHA 300 form, Log of Work Related Injuries and Illnesses; 300-A form, Summary or Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses; and 301 form, Injury and Illness Incident Report.  On or about December 22, 2015, the employer failed to produce upon request, the OSHA 300 and 300A logs.  The employer did not establish or maintain any OSHA Log at their establishment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $420
  • — Z (O) $700

1910.134 C02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2016
Abate by
May 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2): The employer did not develop and implement a respiratory protection program in accordance with sections i and ii of this paragraph (c)(2) for employees who chose to wear respirators where respirator use was not required:  On or about December 22, 2015, the employer failed to issue Appendix D and provide training to employee who are being supplied various N95 respirator/dust masks for voluntary use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2016
Abate by
May 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  On or about December 22, 2015, the employer failed to produce updated documents that show all employees have had training in hazard communication/GHS.   Employees routinely work with various oils and lubricants, degreasers and other general cleaning supplies for maintaining their equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341139590.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.